Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery

2nd Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern, Linz, Austria.

OBJECTIVES. This study investigated the effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation. BACKGROUND. Although gradient estimation by Doppler ultrasound has been shown to be accurate in various clinical and in vitro settings, there have also been reports of substantial discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients. These conflicting results may be due to differences in geometry and hemodynamic characteristics of flow obstructions. METHODS. Stenoses of various geometry were simultaneously studied with continuous wave Doppler and catheter technique in a well controlled pulsatile flow model. RESULTS. Doppler and catheter gradients correlated very well regardless of stenosis geometry and site of distal catheter measurement (r = 0.98 to 0.99, SEE = 1.8 to 5.3 mm Hg). When the catheter was pulled back through the stenosis, the highest gradients were found in or close to the stenosis. When these catheter gradients were compared with Doppler gradients, the agreement between the two techniques was excellent regardless of stenosis geometry (slope 0.97; mean difference 0.6 +/- 2.0 mm Hg). However, when distal pressures were measured 10 cm downstream from the stenotic segment, the slope of the regression line, and therefore the agreement between Doppler and catheter gradients, differed for the different stenosis types (slopes from 0.98 to 1.69). In stenoses with abrupt narrowing and abrupt expansion, agreement was acceptable. Doppler gradients were only slightly greater than catheter gradients (mean difference 4.5 +/- 5.2 mm Hg). In stenoses with a gradually tapering inlet and outlet, the Doppler-catheter gradient relation was dependent on the outflow angle. Good agreement was found for an angle of 60 degrees (mean difference 0.6 +/- 1.8 mm Hg). In stenoses with a 40 degrees outflow angle, Doppler gradients exceeded the catheter gradients by 13% on average; for stenoses with a 20 degrees outflow angle, Doppler gradients exceeded catheter gradients by 46 +/- 11.4%, with differences as great as 65 mm Hg. These results were identical for stenoses gradually tapering outward to the distal tubing diameter and those with abrupt expansion after 2 cm of gradual expansion. The results were also not affected by changing the inflow angle from 20 degrees to 60 degrees. However, an abrupt narrowing instead of a tapering inlet significantly altered the Doppler-catheter gradient relation (p < 0.001); Doppler gradients exceeded the catheter gradients by 34 +/- 10% for this stenosis type. CONCLUSIONS. Doppler gradients accurately reflect the highest gradients across flow obstructions that occur in the vena contracta. However, these gradients may be significantly greater than catheter gradients that are measured farther downstream, as is usually the case in clinical catheterization studies. These discrepancies are due to pressure recovery. The magnitude of pressure recovery is highly dependent on the stenosis geometry, which therefore significantly affects the Doppler-catheter gradient relation. It is the outflow geometry that predominantly influences this relation, but the shape of the inlet may affect the results as well. Although pressure recovery occurs even in stenoses with abrupt narrowing and abrupt expansion, the phenomenon is most likely to become clinically relevant in stenoses with a gradually tapering inlet and outlet with an outflow angle < or = 20 degrees.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Giardini and T. A. Tacy Non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients in regurgitant jets: an overdue consideration Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 578 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Richards, D. Deserranno, E. Donal, N. L. Greenberg, J. D. Thomas, and M. J. Garcia Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1410 - H1416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, I. Wallentin, P. Ask, and B. Wranne Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: An in vivo and in vitro study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 287 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. G. DeGroff, R. Shandas, and L. Valdes-Cruz Pressure recovery and aortic stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 260 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Isaaz The ratio of post-valvular aorta to valvular orifice cross-sectional areas: a new haemodynamic index of clinical importance in patients with aortic stenosis? Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1294 - 1296. [PDF]

				W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, and K.-R. Karsch Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Baumgartner, T. Stefenelli, J. Niederberger, H. Schima, and G. Maurer "overestimation" of catheter gradients by doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1655 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ledru, P. Theroux, J. Lesperance, J. Laurier, P. Ducimetiere, J.-L.e. Guermonprez, B. Diebold, and D. Blanchard Geometric features of coronary artery lesions favoring acute occlusion and myocardial infarction: a quantitative angiographic study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 1999; 33(5): 1353 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Y. Leung, J. Wong, L. Rodriguez, M. Pu, P. M. Vandervoort, and J. D. Thomas Application of Color Doppler Flow Mapping to Calculate Orifice Area of St Jude Mitral Valve Circulation, September 22, 1998; 98(12): 1205 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. Cape, M. Jones, I. Yamada, M. D. VanAuker, and L. M. Valdes-Cruz Turbulent/Viscous Interactions Control Doppler/Catheter Pressure Discrepancies in Aortic Stenosis: The Role of the Reynolds Number Circulation, December 1, 1996; 94(11): 2975 - 2981. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Niederberger, H. Schima, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Importance of Pressure Recovery for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Ultrasound: Role of Aortic Size, Aortic Valve Area, and Direction of the Stenotic Jet In Vitro Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1934 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Bartunek, S. U. Sys, A. C. Rodrigues, E. Van Schuerbeeck, L. Mortier, and B. de Bruyne Abnormal Systolic Intraventricular Flow Velocities After Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis : Mechanisms, Predictive Factors, and Prognostic Significance Circulation, February 15, 1996; 93(4): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. M. Vandervoort, N. L. Greenberg, M. Pu, K. A. Powell, D. M. Cosgrove, and J. D. Thomas Pressure Recovery in Bileaflet Heart Valve Prostheses : Localized High Velocities and Gradients in Central and Side Orifices With Implications for Doppler-Catheter Gradient Relation in Aortic and Mitral Position Circulation, December 15, 1995; 92(12): 3464 - 3472. [Abstract] [Full Text]