JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 21:1002-1007
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, H.
Right arrow Articles by Baylen, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weber, H.
Right arrow Articles by Baylen, B.

Discrepancies in aortic growth explain aortic arch gradients during exercise

HS Weber, SE Cyran, M Grzeszczak, JL Myers, MM Gleason, and BG Baylen

Section of Pediatrics (Cardiology) and Surgery (Cardiothoracic), Pennsylvania State University, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033.

OBJECTIVES. This study was conducted to evaluate the incidence and etiology of hypertension and aortic arch gradients during exercise in patients who have apparent good coarctation repair assessed at rest. BACKGROUND. The reported incidence of recurrent aortic arch obstruction (rest gradient > 20 mm Hg) after previous successful surgical repair varies from 0% to 60% and usually is associated with recurrent stenosis at the site of surgical repair. METHODS. Maximal treadmill exercise with Doppler echocardiographic gradient estimation was performed in 28 patients with a good coarctation repair at rest (normal blood pressure and arch gradient < 20 mm Hg) who had isolated coarctation repair a mean of 7.8 years previously. RESULTS. Eight (29%) developed systolic hypertension for age and a mean Doppler gradient of 45 +/- 13 mm Hg. At cardiac catheterization, the rest peak to peak systolic gradient (6 +/- 6 to 28 +/- 7 mm Hg, p < 0.001), peak systolic instantaneous gradient (16 +/- 11 to 48 +/- 9 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and cardiac index (3.5 +/- 0.7 to 5.9 +/- 1.1 liters/m per m2, p < 0.001) all increased during isoproterenol infusion. Angiographic systolic aortic arch measurements proximal to the innominate artery, left common carotid artery, left subclavian artery and the narrowest dimension at the coarctation repair site demonstrated hypoplasia at the left common carotid artery (11.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 16.7 +/- 2.9 mm/m2, p < 0.01) and left subclavian artery (11.6 +/- 1.7 vs. 15.4 +/- 3.1 mm/m2, p < 0.05) compared with findings in 10 patients with normal aortograms. Transverse aortic arch ratios were also smaller in the eight patients with abnormal findings. Preoperative angiographic ratios were not predictive of late postoperative findings. CONCLUSIONS. Exercise testing detects hypertension and arch gradients in patients with a good coarctation repair as assessed at rest. The hypertension and arch "obstruction" appear to be related to discrepancies in the growth of the transverse aortic arch proximal to the repair site, rather than a "recoarctation" of the aorta.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H.-G. Lim, W.-H. Kim, W.-S. Jang, C. Lim, J. G. Kwak, C. Lee, S. W. Hwang, and C.-H. Lee
One-stage total repair of aortic arch anomaly using regional perfusion
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 31(2): 242 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D Boshoff, W Budts, L Mertens, B Eyskens, T Delhaas, B Meyns, W Daenen, and M Gewillig
Stenting of hypoplastic aortic segments with mild pressure gradients and arterial hypertension
Heart, November 1, 2006; 92(11): 1661 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. Pandey, M. Jackson, S. Ajab, G. Gladman, and M. Pozzi
Subclavian Flap Repair: Review of 399 Patients at Median Follow-Up of Fourteen Years
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1420 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. W.J. Vriend, A. H. Zwinderman, E. de Groot, J. J.P. Kastelein, B. J. Bouma, and B. J.M. Mulder
Predictive value of mild, residual descending aortic narrowing for blood pressure and vascular damage in patients after repair of aortic coarctation
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 84 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Ou, D. Bonnet, L. Auriacombe, E. Pedroni, F. Balleux, D. Sidi, and E. Mousseaux
Late systemic hypertension and aortic arch geometry after successful repair of coarctation of the aorta
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2004; 25(20): 1853 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M.-A. Elgamal, E. D. McKenzie, and C. D. Fraser Jr
Aortic arch advancement: the optimal one-stage approach for surgical management of neonatal coarctation with arch hypoplasia
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 73(4): 1267 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. R. Marx
"Repaired" aortic coarctation in adults: not a "simple" congenital heart defect
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2000; 35(4): 1003 - 1006.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. Daebritz, B. Fausten, J. Sachweh, E. Muhler, A. Franke, and B. J. Messmer
Anatomically positioned aorta ascending-descending bypass grafting via left posterolateral thoracotomy for reoperation of aortic coarctation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 16(5): 519 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.