JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 21:822-834
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pashkow, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pashkow, F.

Issues in contemporary cardiac rehabilitation: a historical perspective

FJ Pashkow

Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195.

Cardiac rehabilitation consists of exercise, psychosocial support and education and is prescribed most often for patients with coronary heart disease. Its purpose is to facilitate readaptation to normal life through the achievement of maximal functional capability and to reduce heart disease risk factors. It began historically with progressive ambulation after myocardial infarction and by 1980 became a standardized inpatient therapy performed according to a stepped procedure. Predischarge exercise testing was added and has become a meaningful contribution to the concept of risk stratification after an acute coronary event. Rehabilitation has subsequently become part of the outpatient environment and is delivered by multiple models. Meta-analyses have shown that rehabilitation reduces overall and cardiovascular deaths by about 20% and sudden death by about 37% during the year after an acute myocardial infarction. The significance of this, however, must now be modulated by the dynamic role of aggressive coronary intervention. Selection for such intervention has become an important adjunctive aspect of rehabilitation. Newer findings suggest that those stratified at low risk will benefit most by the modification of coronary risk factors, and that patients previously thought to be poor candidates for rehabilitation (such as those with significant left ventricular dysfunction and low work capacity) may experience substantial relative functional benefit. Beyond risk stratification, important contemporary issues include surveillance of patients after angioplasty, the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the attenuation or reversal of both native and vein graft atherosclerosis and consideration of such currently emphasized end points as quality of life and economic evaluation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
M. A. Dolansky and S. M. Moore
Older Adults' Early Disability Following a Cardiac Event
West J Nurs Res, March 1, 2008; 30(2): 163 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. A. Ades
Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., September 20, 2001; 345(12): 892 - 902.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. N. Bairey Merz, M. Paul-Labrador, and P. Vongvanich
Time to Reevaluate Risk Stratification Guidelines for Medically Supervised Exercise Training in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
JAMA, March 15, 2000; 283(11): 1476 - 1478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. M. Lightwood and S. A. Glantz
Short-term Economic and Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation : Myocardial Infarction and Stroke
Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1089 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.