Comparison of high energy direct current and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

OBJECTIVES. The goal of the study was to determine short- and long-term success and complications of radiofrequency atrioventricular (AV) junction catheter ablation and to compare these with those of high energy direct current catheter ablation. BACKGROUND. Catheter ablation of the AV junction with radiofrequency or direct current energy is an accepted treatment for drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardias. Few data are available on the long-term success and effects of radiofrequency ablation or its comparison with direct current ablation. METHODS. Fifty-four patients who underwent attempted AV junction ablation with radiofrequency energy were followed up for a mean of 24 +/- 8.4 months. These patients were retrospectively compared with 49 patients who underwent attempted AV junction ablation with direct current energy and were followed up for a mean of 41 +/- 23 months. RESULTS. The early success rate at the time of discharge for radiofrequency ablation was 81.5%, which was not statistically different from that for direct current ablation (85.7%). Fewer sessions were required to achieve complete AV block in the radiofrequency group (1.05 +/- 0.23) (mean +/- SD) compared with the direct current group (1.21 +/- 0.41) (p = 0.02). Although overall complication rates were similar for both groups (9.3% in the radiofrequency group and 8.2% in the direct current group), there was a trend toward more life-threatening early complications in those patients who received direct-current shocks (6.8%) than in those who underwent radiofrequency ablation alone (2.3%) (p = 0.1). Early sudden death (one patient), early ventricular tachycardia (two patients) and cardiac tamponade (one patient) were seen only in those patients who underwent ablation with direct current energy, whereas pulmonary embolism (one patient) was the only early life-threatening complication in the radiofrequency group. During follow-up, the rate of recurrence of AV conduction was the same (5%) for both the direct current and radiofrequency groups. In the direct current group, one patient died suddenly 2 weeks after the procedure and another had a cardiac arrest due to ventricular tachycardia 6 h after the procedure. In the radiofrequency group, two patients died suddenly at 11 and 7 months, respectively. Two patients, one who had unsuccessful radiofrequency ablation and required direct current ablation, were resuscitated from ventricular tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS. Radiofrequency energy appears to be as efficacious as and perhaps safer than direct current energy for AV junction ablation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. S. Tan, M. Rienstra, A. C.P. Wiesfeld, B. A. Schoonderwoerd, H. H.F. Hobbel, and I. C. Van Gelder Long-term outcome of the atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation for symptomatic refractory atrial fibrillation Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 412 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Betts Atrioventricular junction ablation and pacemaker implant for atrial fibrillation: still a valid treatment in appropriately selected patients Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 425 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, M. A. Creager, D. R. Holmes Jr, G. Merli, G. P. Rodgers, C. M. Tracy, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2006 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Invasive Electrophysiology Studies, Catheter Ablation, and Cardioversion: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training Developed in Collaboration With the Heart Rhythm Society J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1503 - 1517. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D.M Engelmann and S. Pehrson Quality of life in nonpharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2003; 24(15): 1387 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Ozcan, A. Jahangir, P. A. Friedman, D. L. Hayes, T. M. Munger, R. F. Rea, M. A. Lloyd, D. L. Packer, D. O. Hodge, B. J. Gersh, et al. Sudden death after radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node in patients with atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 3, 2002; 40(1): 105 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Szili-Torok, G. P. Kimman, D. Theuns, D. Poldermans, J. R. T. C. Roelandt, and L. J. Jordaens Deterioration of left ventricular function following atrio-ventricular node ablation and right ventricular apical pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 61 - 65. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Ozcan, A. Jahangir, P. A. Friedman, P. J. Patel, T. M. Munger, R. F. Rea, M. A. Lloyd, D. L. Packer, D. O. Hodge, D. L. Hayes, et al. Long-Term Survival after Ablation of the Atrioventricular Node and Implantation of a Permanent Pacemaker in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation N. Engl. J. Med., April 5, 2001; 344(14): 1043 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, W. L. Winters, J. L. Achord, A. W. Boone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, B. H. Lorell, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on invasive electrophysiology studies, catheter ablation, and cardioversion: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association/american college of physicians-american society of internal medicine task force on clinical competence J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1725 - 1736. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, W. L. Winters, J. L. Achord, A. W. Boone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, B. H. Lorell, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Invasive Electrophysiology Studies, Catheter Ablation, and Cardioversion : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence Circulation, October 31, 2000; 102(18): 2309 - 2320. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Hamdan, R. L. Page, C. J. Sheehan, J. D. Zagrodzky, S. L. Wasmund, K. Ramaswamy, J. A. Joglar, and M. L. Smith Increased sympathetic activity after atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2000; 36(1): 151 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Luderitz and W. Jung Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Arch Intern Med, June 26, 2000; 160(12): 1749 - 1757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Wood, C. Brown-Mahoney, G. N. Kay, and K. A. Ellenbogen Clinical Outcomes After Ablation and Pacing Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation : A Meta-Analysis Circulation, March 14, 2000; 101(10): 1138 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Levy Atrioventricular junctional ablation and pacing for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the Barcelona recommendations Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(1): 2 - 4. [PDF]

				M. Brignole, M. Gammage, L. Jordaens, R. Sutton, and on behalf of the Barcelona Discussion Group Report of a study group on ablate and pace therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(1): 8 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Scheinman Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure : The Intersection of Two Common Diseases Circulation, September 8, 1998; 98(10): 941 - 942. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Brignole, C. Menozzi, L. Gianfranchi, G. Musso, R. Mureddu, N. Bottoni, and G. Lolli Assessment of Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and VVIR Pacemaker Versus Pharmacological Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation : A Randomized, Controlled Study Circulation, September 8, 1998; 98(10): 953 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M BRIGNOLE Ablate and pace: a pragmatic approach to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation not controlled by antiarrhythmic drugs Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 531 - 533. [Full Text]

				B. P. Knight, R. Weiss, M. Bahu, J. Souza, A. Zivin, R. Goyal, E. Daoud, K. C. Man, S. A. Strickberger, and F. Morady Cost Comparison of Radiofrequency Modification and Ablation of the Atrioventricular Junction in Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, September 2, 1997; 96(5): 1532 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S.-A. Chen, S.-H. Lee, C.-E. Chiang, C.-T. Tai, T.-J. Wu, C.-C. Cheng, Z.-C. Wen, C.-W. Chiou, K.-C. Ueng, and M.-S. Chang Electrophysiological Mechanisms in Successful Radiofrequency Catheter Modification of Atrioventricular Junction for Patients With Medically Refractory Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, May 1, 1996; 93(9): 1690 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Nath, J. P. DiMarco, J. P. Mounsey, J. H. Lobban, and D. E. Haines Correlation of Temperature and Pathophysiological Effect During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the AV Junction Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1188 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Z. Blanck, A. A. Dhala, J. Sra, S. S. Deshpande, A. J. Anderson, M. Akhtar, and M. R. Jazayeri Characterization of Atrioventricular Nodal Behavior and Ventricular Response During Atrial Fibrillation Before and After a Selective Slow-Pathway Ablation Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1086 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text]