cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 21:269-273
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zaret, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zaret, B.

Use of nonionic or low osmolar contrast agents in cardiovascular procedures. American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee

JL Ritchie, SE Nissen, JS Douglas Jr, LS Dreifus, RJ Gibbons, CB Higgins, HR Schelbert, JB Seward, and BL Zaret

Low osmolar contrast agents produce less adverse electrophysiologic and hemodynamic alterations during cardiac catheterization. The nonionic agents probably reduce the risk of provoking myocardial ischemia during coronary arteriography or ventriculography. Patients also report less subjective sensation of discomfort during administration of low osmolar agents for cardiovascular procedures. However, nonionic agents have not been proved to reduce the incidence of several serious complications of cardiac catheterization, including acute renal failure and anaphylactoid reaction. Although evidence is inconclusive, there may be an increased risk of thromboembolic complications during cardiac catheterization when certain low osmolar nonionic agents are administered. Nonionic contrast agents have not been definitely proved to reduce the risk of death after cardiac catheterization.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. Mueller, G. Buerkle, H. J. Buettner, J. Petersen, A. P. Perruchoud, U. Eriksson, S. Marsch, and H. Roskamm
Prevention of Contrast Media-Associated Nephropathy: Randomized Comparison of 2 Hydration Regimens in 1620 Patients Undergoing Coronary Angioplasty
Arch Intern Med, February 11, 2002; 162(3): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. D. Jacobson and C. J. Rosenquist
The Use of Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents: Technological Change and Defensive Medicine
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1996; 21(2): 243 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. G. Ellis, D. P. Miller, K. J. Brown, N. Omoigui, G. L. Howell, M. Kutner, and E. J. Topol
In-Hospital Cost of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization : Critical Determinants and Implications
Circulation, August 15, 1995; 92(4): 741 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home