Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993; 21:102-109
© 1993 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F
Right arrow Articles by Kalbfleisch, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F
Right arrow Articles by Kalbfleisch, S.

A prospective randomized comparison of direct current and radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular junction

F Morady, H Calkins, JJ Langberg, WF Armstrong, M de Buitleir, R el-Atassi, and SJ Kalbfleisch

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to compare direct current and radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) junction in a prospective randomized fashion. BACKGROUND. Catheter ablation of the AV junction can be performed using either direct current shocks or radiofrequency energy. To date, these two techniques have never been compared prospectively or in a randomized study. METHODS. Forty patients with drug-refractory uncontrolled atrial fibrillation-flutter (38 patients) or inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2 patients) were randomly assigned to undergo direct current ablation (20 patients) using up to four shocks of 200 to 300 J or radiofrequency ablation (20 patients) using up to 15 applications of 16 to 25 W for 30 s. If complete AV block was not successfully induced, the ablation procedure was repeated using the alternate type of energy. A rate-responsive ventricular pacemaker was implanted in each patient. The intrinsic escape rhythm was evaluated 15 min, 2 days and 3, 6 and 12 months after ablation. RESULTS. Persistent complete AV block was successfully induced during the first ablation session in 13 (65%) of 20 patients randomly assigned to undergo direct current ablation, compared with 19 (95%) of 20 patients randomly assigned to undergo radiofrequency ablation (p < 0.05). Each patient whose first ablation attempt failed had a successful outcome with the alternate type of energy. The overall efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (26 [96%] of 27 patients) was significantly greater than that of direct current ablation (14 [67%] of 21 patients, p < 0.01). The duration of the direct current and radiofrequency ablation sessions did not differ significantly. The mean peak plasma creatine kinase MB fraction concentration was significantly higher after direct current ablation (58 +/- 29 IU/liter) than after radiofrequency ablation (2 +/- 2 IU/liter) (p < 0.001). An escape rhythm was present 15 min after ablation in an equal proportion of patients undergoing direct current and radiofrequency ablation (78% and 85%, respectively, p = 0.6). An escape rhythm was present in all patients 3, 6 and 12 months after ablation. The mean escape rhythm cycle length 15 min after direct current ablation (2,074 +/- 677 ms) was significantly longer than that 15 min after radiofrequency ablation (1,460 +/- 294 ms) (p < 0.05); however, the mean escape rhythm cycle lengths did not differ significantly at 2 days or 3, 6 or 12 months after ablation. Immediate arrhythmic complications did not occur after either procedure. One patient died suddenly 6.5 months after direct current ablation. CONCLUSIONS. Radiofrequency ablation of the AV junction is more efficacious and safer than direct current ablation and should be the preferred method for inducing complete AV block in patients who are appropriate candidates for ablation of AV conduction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, M. A. Creager, D. R. Holmes Jr, G. Merli, G. P. Rodgers, C. M. Tracy, et al.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2006 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Invasive Electrophysiology Studies, Catheter Ablation, and Cardioversion: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training Developed in Collaboration With the Heart Rhythm Society
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1503 - 1517.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. McKeown and A. E. Epstein
Future Directions: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 61S - 64S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. Ghaye, D. Szapiro, J.-N. Dacher, L.-M. Rodriguez, C. Timmermans, D. Devillers, and R. F. Dondelinger
Percutaneous Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Cross-sectional Imaging
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2003; 23(90001): S19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. M. Scheinman and F. Morady
Nonpharmacological Approaches to Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, April 24, 2001; 103(16): 2120 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, W. L. Winters, J. L. Achord, A. W. Boone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, B. H. Lorell, et al.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on invasive electrophysiology studies, catheter ablation, and cardioversion: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association/american college of physicians-american society of internal medicine task force on clinical competence
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1725 - 1736.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, W. L. Winters, J. L. Achord, A. W. Boone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, B. H. Lorell, et al.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Invasive Electrophysiology Studies, Catheter Ablation, and Cardioversion : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence
Circulation, October 31, 2000; 102(18): 2309 - 2320.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Wood, C. Brown-Mahoney, G. N. Kay, and K. A. Ellenbogen
Clinical Outcomes After Ablation and Pacing Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation : A Meta-Analysis
Circulation, March 14, 2000; 101(10): 1138 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C.-P. Lau, H.-F. Tse, and G. M. Ayers
Defibrillation-guided radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation secondary to an atrial focus
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 1999; 33(5): 1217 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Calkins, P. Yong, J. M. Miller, B. Olshansky, M. Carlson, J. P. Saul, S. K. S. Huang, L. B. Liem, L. S. Klein, S. A. Moser, et al.
Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathways, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia, and the Atrioventricular Junction : Final Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial
Circulation, January 19, 1999; 99(2): 262 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
S. Levy
Atrioventricular junctional ablation and pacing for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the Barcelona recommendations
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(1): 2 - 4.
[PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Brignole, M. Gammage, L. Jordaens, R. Sutton, and on behalf of the Barcelona Discussion Group
Report of a study group on ablate and pace therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(1): 8 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. M. Gillis
The Atrial Pacing Peri-ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PA3) Study: Rationale and study design
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(1): 40 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. M. Scheinman
Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure : The Intersection of Two Common Diseases
Circulation, September 8, 1998; 98(10): 941 - 942.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Brignole, C. Menozzi, L. Gianfranchi, G. Musso, R. Mureddu, N. Bottoni, and G. Lolli
Assessment of Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and VVIR Pacemaker Versus Pharmacological Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation : A Randomized, Controlled Study
Circulation, September 8, 1998; 98(10): 953 - 960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. G. Kim, V. Sompalli, A. Rameneni, M. K. Gadde, M. Pamidi, R. Pathapati, K. J. Ferrick, J. Gross, U. Ben-Zur, S. Furman, et al.
Symptomatic Improvement After AV Nodal Ablation and Pacemaker Implantation for Refractory Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter
Angiology, November 1, 1997; 48(11): 933 - 938.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Nath, J. P. DiMarco, J. P. Mounsey, J. H. Lobban, and D. E. Haines
Correlation of Temperature and Pathophysiological Effect During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the AV Junction
Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1188 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. D. Williamson, K. C. Man, E. Daoud, M. Niebauer, S. A. Strickberger, and F. Morady
Radiofrequency Catheter Modification of Atrioventricular Conduction to Control the Ventricular Rate during Atrial Fibrillation
N. Engl. J. Med., October 6, 1994; 331(14): 910 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement