Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model

Helmholtz Institute for Biomechanical Engineering Aachen University of Technology, Germany.

OBJECTIVES. This study was designed to study pressure recovery in various models of aortic valve stenosis by performing hemodynamic measurements under physiologic conditions in a pulsatile aortic flow circuit. The results were used to validate calculations of pressure recovery based on theoretic considerations derived from fluid dynamics. BACKGROUND. Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis has not been systematically analyzed. METHODS. Stenoses varying in size, shape (circular, Y-shaped, slitlike) and inlet configuration (sharp-edged, nozzle-shaped inlet, artificially stenosed bioprostheses) were used. Aortic pressures were measured at multiple sites distal to the stenotic orifice to determine pressure gradients and recovery. RESULTS. With decreasing orifice area (2, 1.5, 1 and 0.5 cm2) pressure recovery increased (5, 7, 10 and 16 mm Hg, respectively) and the index pressure recovery to maximal peak to peak gradient decreased (56%, 37%, 24% and 14%, respectively). For a given orifice size of 0.5 cm2, this index ranged between 12% for a Y-shaped orifice and 15% for a circular orifice with a nozzle (cardiac output 4 liters/min). Increasing the cardiac output increased pressure recovery, whereas the ratio of pressure recovery to maximal pressure gradient remained constant. CONCLUSIONS. The index pressure recovery to transvalvular pressure gradient, which expresses the hemodynamic relevance of pressure recovery, decreases with increasing severity of aortic stenosis but is independent of transvalvular flow. Thus, pressure recovery is of minor importance in severe aortic stenosis but may account for discrepancies between Doppler and manometric gradients observed in patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis or a prosthetic valve in the aortic position.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Giardini and T. A. Tacy Non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients in regurgitant jets: an overdue consideration Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 578 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Garcia, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, L. Kadem, and P. Pibarot Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 435 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Levine and E. Schwammenthal Stenosis is in the eye of the observer: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aortic valve area J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 443 - 445. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Garcia, P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, F. Sakr, and L.-G. Durand Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity : A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept Circulation, February 22, 2000; 101(7): 765 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. G. DeGroff, R. Shandas, and L. Valdes-Cruz Pressure recovery and aortic stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 260 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Isaaz The ratio of post-valvular aorta to valvular orifice cross-sectional areas: a new haemodynamic index of clinical importance in patients with aortic stenosis? Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1294 - 1296. [PDF]

				W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, and K.-R. Karsch Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. G. Klues, E. R. Schwarz, J. vom Dahl, T. Reffelmann, H. Reul, K. Potthast, C. Schmitz, J. Minartz, W. Krebs, and i. Hanrath Disturbed Intracoronary Hemodynamics in Myocardial Bridging : Early Normalization by Intracoronary Stent Placement Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2905 - 2913. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. G. Cape, M. Jones, I. Yamada, M. D. VanAuker, and L. M. Valdes-Cruz Turbulent/Viscous Interactions Control Doppler/Catheter Pressure Discrepancies in Aortic Stenosis: The Role of the Reynolds Number Circulation, December 1, 1996; 94(11): 2975 - 2981. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Niederberger, H. Schima, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Importance of Pressure Recovery for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Ultrasound: Role of Aortic Size, Aortic Valve Area, and Direction of the Stenotic Jet In Vitro Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1934 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Laske, R. Jenni, M. Maloigne, G. Vassalli, O. Bertel, and M. I. Turina Pressure Gradients Across Bileaflet Aortic Valves by Direct Measurement and Echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 48 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. M. Vandervoort, N. L. Greenberg, M. Pu, K. A. Powell, D. M. Cosgrove, and J. D. Thomas Pressure Recovery in Bileaflet Heart Valve Prostheses : Localized High Velocities and Gradients in Central and Side Orifices With Implications for Doppler-Catheter Gradient Relation in Aortic and Mitral Position Circulation, December 15, 1995; 92(12): 3464 - 3472. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				W. Voelker, H. Reul, G. N. Ing, T. S. Ing, B. S. Ing, A. S. Ing, and K. R. Karsch Comparison of Valvular Resistance, Stroke Work Loss, and Gorlin Valve Area for Quantification of Aortic Stenosis : An In Vitro Study in a Pulsatile Aortic Flow Model Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1196 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text]