Aortic valve resistance as an adjunct to the Gorlin formula in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis in symptomatic patients

Cardiology Division, Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

OBJECTIVES. This study was conducted to determine the utility of aortic valve resistance in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis. BACKGROUND. Assessment of the severity of aortic stenosis has traditionally employed hemodynamic data and the Gorlin formula to calculate the area of the aortic valve. Recently, flow dependence of the Gorlin formula has been identified and the accuracy of the formula challenged. Aortic valve resistance, the quotient of gradient and cardiac output, has been advanced as potentially useful in assessing the severity of valve stenosis. METHODS. We studied 48 symptomatic patients with an initial diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis based on a calculated aortic valve area of less than or equal to 0.8 cm2 by the Gorlin formula. Forty of these patients (Group I) were confirmed to have severe aortic stenosis, whereas 8 (Group II) were subsequently proved not to have severe aortic stenosis. The 18 patients in Group I with a valve area of 0.6 to 0.8 cm2 (Group IA) were directly compared with Group II patients who had a similar valve area. RESULTS. Aortic valve area was nearly identical in Group IA and Group II patients (0.69 +/- 0.05 and 0.71 +/- 0.06 cm2, respectively, p = NS). However, aortic valve resistance was much less in Group II patients (212 +/- 6 vs. 316 +/- 11 dynes.s.cm-5, p less than 0.0001). In this small cohort, aortic valve resistance achieved nearly complete separation of patients in Groups IA and II. CONCLUSIONS. In some patients with relatively mild aortic stenosis, the calculated valve area may indicate that the stenosis is severe. The use of aortic valve resistance in conjunction with the Gorlin formula helps separate patients with truly severe aortic stenosis from those with milder disease.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J Bermejo and R Yotti Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis: value and limitations of dobutamine stress testing Heart, March 1, 2007; 93(3): 298 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Lange and L. D. Hillis Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1718 - 1720. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Chambers Low "gradient", low flow aortic stenosis. Heart, April 1, 2006; 92(4): 554 - 558. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Grayburn Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Dobutamine Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 604 - 606. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Blais, I. G. Burwash, G. Mundigler, J. G. Dumesnil, N. Loho, F. Rader, H. Baumgartner, R. S. Beanlands, B. Chayer, L. Kadem, et al. Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 711 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Peterson Severe Calcific Aortic Stenosis: Left Ventricular Afterload and its Quantification J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 299 - 301. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Roberts and J. M. Ko Relation of weights of operatively excised stenotic aortic valves to preoperative transvalvular peak systolic pressure gradients and to calculated aortic valve areas J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1847 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello Is it ever too late to operate on the patient with valvular heart disease? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 376 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Mascherbauer, H. Schima, R. Rosenhek, M. Czerny, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Value and limitations of aortic valve resistance with particular consideration of low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis: an in vitro study Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2004; 25(9): 787 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-L. Monin, J.-P. Quere, M. Monchi, H. Petit, S. Baleynaud, C. Chauvel, C. Pop, P. Ohlmann, C. Lelguen, P. Dehant, et al. Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Operative Risk Stratification and Predictors for Long-Term Outcome: A Multicenter Study Using Dobutamine Stress Hemodynamics Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 319 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. M. Mueller and L. K. von Segesser A new equine pericardial stentless valve J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1405 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Grayburn and E. J. Eichhorn Dobutamine Challenge for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Circulation, August 13, 2002; 106(7): 763 - 765. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Nishimura, J. A. Grantham, H. M. Connolly, H. V. Schaff, S. T. Higano, and D. R. Holmes Jr Low-Output, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Depressed Left Ventricular Systolic Function: The Clinical Utility of the Dobutamine Challenge in the Catheterization Laboratory Circulation, August 13, 2002; 106(7): 809 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello Ventricular function in aortic stenosis: how low can you go? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1364 - 1365. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello Evaluation and Management of Patients With Aortic Stenosis Circulation, April 16, 2002; 105(15): 1746 - 1750. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello Aortic Stenosis N. Engl. J. Med., February 28, 2002; 346(9): 677 - 682. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-L. Monin, M. Monchi, V. Gest, A.-M. Duval-Moulin, J.-L. Dubois-Rande, and P. Gueret Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients: Risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2101 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Schwammenthal, Z. Vered, Y. Moshkowitz, B. Rabinowitz, Z. Ziskind, A. K. Smolinski, and M. S. Feinberg Dobutamine Echocardiography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Predicting Outcome as a Function of Management Strategy Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1766 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F ANTONINI-CANTERIN, P FAGGIANO, D ZANUTTINI, and F RIBICHINI Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis? Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 9 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Takeda, H Rimington, and J Chambers The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 11 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello and F. A. Crawford Valvular Heart Disease N. Engl. J. Med., July 3, 1997; 337(1): 32 - 41. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello Timing of Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis : Moving Closer to Perfection Circulation, May 6, 1997; 95(9): 2241 - 2243. [Full Text]

				W. K. Laskey, W. G. Kussmaul, and A. Noordergraaf Valvular and Systemic Arterial Hemodynamics in Aortic Valve Stenosis : A Model-Based Approach Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1473 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				W. Voelker, H. Reul, G. N. Ing, T. S. Ing, B. S. Ing, A. S. Ing, and K. R. Karsch Comparison of Valvular Resistance, Stroke Work Loss, and Gorlin Valve Area for Quantification of Aortic Stenosis : An In Vitro Study in a Pulsatile Aortic Flow Model Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1196 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text]