JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 20:1333-1338
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, A
Right arrow Articles by Cachera, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, A
Right arrow Articles by Cachera, J.

Effects of time and previous acute rejection episodes on coronary vascular reserve in human heart transplant recipients

A Nitenberg, E Aptecar, C Benvenuti, N Benhaiem, O Tavolaro, D Loisance, and JP Cachera

Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Unite 251, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire Xavier-Bichat, Paris, France.

OBJECTIVES. This study examined whether previous rejection episodes may have deleterious effects on coronary vascular reserve of heart transplant recipients months after transplantation. BACKGROUND. Coronary reserve has been demonstrated to be within the normal range in long-term transplant patients without previous episodes of rejection. Conversely, acute rejection is associated with a dramatic reduction of coronary reserve, which is rapidly restored after therapy. METHODS. Coronary flow velocity was measured by intracoronary Doppler catheter before and after a maximally vasodilating dose of intracoronary papaverine in 16 control subjects and in 59 transplant patients classified into three groups with respect to time after transplantation: 1 to 6 months (group 1, n = 17), 7 to 18 months (group 2, n = 22) and > 18 months (group 3, n = 20). Coronary vascular reserve was evaluated through peak/rest coronary flow velocity ratio and minimal coronary vascular resistance index. All patients had normal findings on left ventricular angiography and coronary arteriography and a normal left ventricular mass. RESULTS. Arterial pressure was normal in all groups. Heart rate in the three groups of transplant patients, mean aortic pressure in groups 1 and 2, left ventricular systolic pressure in group 2 and rate-pressure product in groups 1 and 2 were higher than in control subjects. Average number of rejection episodes per patient was similar in the three groups of patients (group 1, 2.4 +/- 1.4; group 2, 2.5 +/- 1.9, and group 3, 2.1 +/- 1.3). Results showed no difference between each group of transplant patients and control subjects for peak/rest coronary flow velocity ratio (control subjects, 5.2 +/- 0.8; group 1, 5.3 +/- 1.5; group 2, 4.9 +/- 1.2, and group 3, 4.4 +/- 1.6) and for minimal coronary vascular resistance index (control subjects, 0.18 +/- 0.03; group 1, 0.18 +/- 0.04; group 2, 0.20 +/- 0.06, group 3, 0.23 +/- 0.11). In addition, patients with zero or one rejection episode had similar values of peak/rest coronary flow velocity ratio and minimal coronary vascular resistance index (4.3 +/- 1.3 and 0.23 +/- 0.10, respectively, n = 22) as did those with one or two rejection episodes (5.1 +/- 1.5 and 0.19 +/- 0.07, respectively, n = 24), and those with four or more episodes (5.2 +/- 1.4 and 0.19 +/- 0.05, respectively, n = 13). CONCLUSIONS. This study showed that coronary vascular reserve remains within normal range and is independent from the number of previous episodes of rejection until late after transplantation in human heart transplant patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Weis and W. von Scheidt
Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy : A Review
Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 2069 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.