Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics of anterior, midseptal and right anterior free wall accessory pathways
MM Scheinman,
YS Wang,
GF Van Hare,
and
MD Lesh
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to define the electrocardiographic (ECG) and electrophysiologic characteristics of midseptal, anteroseptal and right anterior free wall accessory pathways. METHODS. The fully pre-excited 12-lead surface ECGs and ECGs during orthodromic atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia were compared for 13 patients with an anteroseptal, 7 with a midseptal and 7 with a right free wall accessory pathway. Routine electrophysiologic studies were performed in all and stimulation of the right ventricular summit during tachycardia was accomplished in 10 patients. RESULTS. Differences in the surface ECGs were not sufficiently sensitive to distinguish among accessory pathway locations. Premature ventricular complexes induced from the right ventricular septal summit during ventricular activation either advanced the succeeding atrial depolarization or terminated the tachycardia in three of six patients with a septal pathway and in none of the four with a right anterior pathway. The change in ventriculoatrial (VA) interval with the development of right bundle branch block during orthodromic AV tachycardia proved most helpful in distinguishing these pathways. Patients with a right anterior free wall pathway showed a change in VA interval > or = 40 ms, whereas those with an anteroseptal pathway showed changes of 20 to 30 ms and those with a midseptal pathway showed no change. CONCLUSIONS. Anteroseptal, midseptal and right anterior free wall pathways may be distinguished by using programmed stimulation of the summit of the right ventricular septum and especially with changes in the VA interval with development of right bundle branch block during orthodromic AV reentrant tachycardia.
