JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 20:927-933
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juneau, M
Right arrow Articles by Waters, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juneau, M
Right arrow Articles by Waters, D

Symptom-limited versus low level exercise testing before hospital discharge after myocardial infarction

M Juneau, P Colles, P Theroux, P de Guise, G Pelletier, J Lam, and D Waters

Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Quebec, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. This study was undertaken to compare a low level and a symptom-limited test performed before hospital discharge after an uncomplicated myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND. Exercise testing after myocardial infarction provides useful prognostic information. Usually either a low level test is performed before hospital discharge or a symptom-limited test is performed at 3 weeks. METHODS. The study group comprised 202 patients with an uncomplicated myocardial infarction; 58 patients had a non-Q wave infarction and 115 patients had received thrombolytic therapy. Both a low level and a symptom-limited exercise test were performed in 200 of the 202 study patients in randomized order on consecutive days, a mean of 7.4 +/- 2.3 days after infarction. RESULTS. The symptom-limited test required a considerably greater effort than the low level test: exercise duration was 554 +/- 209 versus 389 +/- 125 s (p less than 0.0001), and peak work load was 5.7 +/- 1.8 versus 4.2 +/- 1.1 METs (p less than 0.0001). The peak heart rate was higher during the symptom-limited test (121 +/- 20 vs. 108 +/- 14 beats/min, p less than 0.0001), as was the rate-pressure product. The number of patients who developed ST segment depression greater than or equal to 1 mm increased from 56 during the low level test to 89 during the symptom-limited test (p less than 0.0001). ST segment depression greater than or equal to 2 mm occurred in 22 patients during the low level test and in 41 patients during the symptom-limited test, an 86% increase (p less than 0.0001). The number of patients with either angina or ST depression greater than or equal to 1 mm increased from 66 to 105 (p less than 0.0001) with the symptom-limited test. Exercise test results were similar for patients with a Q wave or a non-Q wave infarction. Exercise duration was longer and exercise-induced ST depression less frequent in patients who had received thrombolytic therapy. CONCLUSIONS. A symptom-limited exercise test performed before hospital discharge after uncomplicated myocardial infarction provides a significantly greater cardiovascular stress than does a low level test and is associated with an ischemic response nearly twice as frequently. The prognostic significance of a positive response at higher work loads has not been defined.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. F. Fletcher, G. J. Balady, E. A. Amsterdam, B. Chaitman, R. Eckel, J. Fleg, V. F. Froelicher, A. S. Leon, I. L. Pina, R. Rodney, et al.
Exercise Standards for Testing and Training: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
Circulation, October 2, 2001; 104(14): 1694 - 1740.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Bogaty, S. Dumont, G. E. O'Hara, L. Boyer, L. Auclair, J. Jobin, and J.-R. Boudreault
Randomized trial of a noninvasive strategy to reduce hospital stay for patients with low-risk myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1289 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. E. Tavel
Stress Testing in Cardiac Evaluation : Current Concepts With Emphasis on the ECG
Chest, March 1, 2001; 119(3): 907 - 925.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. P. J. Senaratne, G. Smith, and S. S. Gulamhusein
Feasibility and safety of early exercise testing using the Bruce protocol after acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2000; 35(5): 1212 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K Safstrom and E Swahn
Early symptom-limited exercise test for risk stratification in post menopausal women with unstable coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2000; 21(3): 230 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K Jensen-Urstad, B A Samad, F Bouvier, J Hulting, J Hojer, H Ruiz, and M Jensen-Urstad
Prognostic value of symptom limited versus low level exercise stress test before discharge in patients with myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytics
Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 199 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. B. Gill, J. A. Cairns, R. S. Roberts, L. Costantini, B. J. Sealey, E. F. Fallen, C. W. Tomlinson, and M. Gent
Prognostic Importance of Myocardial Ischemia Detected by Ambulatory Monitoring Early after Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., January 11, 1996; 334(2): 65 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
EXERCISE TESTING AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Journal Watch (General), October 20, 1992; 1992(1020): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.