JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 20:1005-1016
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S
Right arrow Articles by Spotnitz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S
Right arrow Articles by Spotnitz, W.

Myocardial contrast echocardiography and the transmural distribution of flow: a critical appraisal during myocardial ischemia not associated with infarction

S Kaul, AR Jayaweera, WP Glasheen, FS Villanueva, HP Gutgesell, and WD Spotnitz

Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville 22908.

OBJECTIVES. This study was undertaken to determine whether myocardial contrast echocardiography can be used to estimate the transmural distribution of flow. BACKGROUND. Myocardial contrast echocardiography has been shown to reliably measure average transmural blood flow during myocardial ischemia. However, there is controversy regarding its ability to determine the transmural distribution of flow. METHODS. The transmural distribution of flow was measured in 21 open chest anesthetized dogs with use of radiolabeled microspheres and sonicated albumin microbubbles (mean size 4.5 microns). In the 11 Group I dogs, myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed at baseline and during left anterior descending artery stenosis. In five of these dogs, it was also performed during left circumflex artery stenosis. In these dogs large (mean 12 microns) hand-agitated bubbles were also used. In the five Group II dogs, myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed before and 45 s after intracoronary injection of 6 mg of papaverine in the presence of a critical left circumflex artery stenosis. The five Group III dogs were studied during cardiopulmonary bypass at baseline and during left anterior descending artery stenosis. Off-line image analysis of the echocardiographic images was performed and time-intensity curves obtained from these images were correlated with radiolabeled microsphere-derived flows. RESULTS. The ratios of the parameters derived from the endocardium and epicardium during myocardial contrast echocardiography were found to correlate poorly (ranging from R2 = 0 to R2 = 0.35) with radiolabeled microsphere-derived endocardial/epicardial flow ratios over a wide range of flow ratios (0.01 to 2.58). These results were not influenced either by the location of the regions of interest (left anterior descending vs. left circumflex artery bed) or by the size of the bubbles (4.5 vs. 12 microns). CONCLUSIONS. Myocardial contrast echocardiography cannot be used to assess the transmural distribution of flow during myocardial ischemia not associated with infarction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
T. H. Marwick
Assessment of Subendocardial Function With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 279 - 281.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S Fukuda, T Muro, T Hozumi, H Watanabe, K Shimada, M Yoshiyama, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa
Changes in transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion assessed by quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans
Heart, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 368 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Derumeaux, J. Loufoua, G. Pontier, A. Cribier, and M. Ovize
Tissue Doppler Imaging Differentiates Transmural From Nontransmural Acute Myocardial Infarction After Reperfusion Therapy
Circulation, January 30, 2001; 103(4): 589 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Masugata, B. Cotter, B. Peters, K. Ohmori, K. Mizushige, and A. N. DeMaria
Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity and Transmural Perfusion Gradient by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography : Comparison of Gray-Scale B-Mode With Power Doppler Imaging
Circulation, September 19, 2000; 102(12): 1427 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Colonna, R. Montisci, L. Galiuto, L. Meloni, and S. Iliceto
Effects of acute ischaemia on intramyocardial contraction heterogeneity; new ultrasound technologies to study an old phenomenon
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 1999; 20(5): 327 - 337.
[PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Z. Linka, J. Sklenar, K. Wei, A. R. Jayaweera, D. M. Skyba, and S. Kaul
Assessment of Transmural Distribution of Myocardial Perfusion With Contrast Echocardiography
Circulation, November 3, 1998; 98(18): 1912 - 1920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Wei, A. R. Jayaweera, S. Firoozan, A. Linka, D. M. Skyba, and S. Kaul
Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow With Ultrasound-Induced Destruction of Microbubbles Administered as a Constant Venous Infusion
Circulation, February 10, 1998; 97(5): 473 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Kaul
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography : 15 Years of Research and Development
Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3745 - 3760.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.