JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 20:408-413
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landzberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cheitlin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Landzberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cheitlin, M.

Etiology of the Austin Flint murmur

JS Landzberg, PW Pflugfelder, MM Cassidy, NB Schiller, CB Higgins, and MD Cheitlin

Cardiovascular Division, University of California, San Francisco.

OBJECTIVES. The aim of the study was to determine the mechanism of the Austin Flint murmur. BACKGROUND. More than 100 years after the initial description of the Austin Flint murmur, the etiology of the murmur remains unclear. METHODS. M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography, conventional and color flow Doppler study, and cine nuclear magnetic resonance (cine NMR) imaging were performed in 24 patients with clinically moderate or severe aortic regurgitation. Mitral valve area was determined by planimetry and pressure half-time measurement. Overlap of the aortic regurgitation and mitral inflow jets was graded 0 (no overlap) to 4 (marked overlap) by Doppler study and cine NMR imaging. The volume of signal loss resulting from turbulent blood flow secondary to the aortic regurgitation jet was determined on cine NMR images, and the extent of contact with the left ventricular endocardium was graded 0 (no contact) to 4 (extensive contact). RESULTS. The presence of an Austin Flint murmur did not correlate with mitral valve area (2.7 +/- 0.8 cm2 with the murmur vs. 2.5 +/- 0.7 cm2 without), overlap of the aortic regurgitation and mitral flow jets (3 +/- 1 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.2), diastolic mitral regurgitation (50% vs. 71%) or fluttering of the anterior mitral valve leaflet (70% vs. 50%). The presence of an Austin Flint murmur correlated best with the volume of signal loss associated with the aortic regurgitation jet on cine NMR imaging (65 +/- 16 ml with the murmur. vs. 38 +/- 11 ml without, p less than 0.001) and the extent of contact of this signal loss with the left ventricular endocardium (2.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.4, p less than 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS. The Austin Flint murmur is caused by the aortic regurgitation jet abutting the left ventricular endocardium, resulting in the generation of a low-pitched diastolic rumbling.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. N. Babu, S. M. Kymes, and S. M. Carpenter Fryer
Eponyms and the Diagnosis of Aortic Regurgitation: What Says the Evidence?
Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 736 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
N. K. Choudhry and E. E. Etchells
Does This Patient Have Aortic Regurgitation?
JAMA, June 16, 1999; 281(23): 2231 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.