Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 20:78-84
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutsch, G
Right arrow Articles by Krayenbuhl, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutsch, G
Right arrow Articles by Krayenbuhl, H.

Cutaneous and coronary flow reserve in patients with microvascular angina

G Sutsch, OM Hess, UK Franzeck, T Dorffler, A Bollinger, and HP Krayenbuhl

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Microvascular angina is characterized by exercise-induced angina in patients with normal coronary arteries and reduced coronary flow reserve. Recently, a generalized disorder of abnormal vascular reactivity in microvascular angina has been postulated. Therefore, coronary flow reserve was determined by the coronary sinus thermodilution technique and compared with the cutaneous flux ratio in 6 control subjects (group 1) and 12 patients with microvascular angina (group 2). Coronary flow reserve was calculated from maximal coronary flow after 0.5 mg/kg of dipyridamole divided by flow at rest. Cutaneous flow ratio was estimated by laser Doppler fluxmetry (right forearm) before and after 4 min of suprasystolic blood pressure occlusion. Coronary flow at rest was identical in the two groups, but after maximal vasodilation with dipyridamole, coronary flow was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p less than 0.05). Coronary flow reserve differed significantly between the two groups (2.9 in group 1 and 1.3 in group 2; p less than 0.001). Cutaneous Doppler flux at rest was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p less than 0.05). However, the hyperemic response was identical in both groups. It is concluded that the cutaneous flux ratio in patients with microvascular angina is not impaired. Local peripheral vasomotor tone appears to be increased in patients with microvascular angina because cutaneous flow at rest is reduced. Thus, a generalized disorder of abnormal vascular reactivity cannot be confirmed in patients with microvascular angina.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A.D. Hughes and S. Thom
Wearing your heart in your sleeve?
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2001; 22(13): 1071 - 1073.
[PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement