Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 20:127-134
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malik, M
Right arrow Articles by Camm, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malik, M
Right arrow Articles by Camm, J

Frequency versus time domain analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiograms. I. Reproducibility of the results

M Malik, P Kulakowski, J Poloniecki, A Staunton, O Odemuyiwa, T Farrell, and J Camm

Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, England.

Three repeated signal-averaged electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings were made in 40 subjects (15 healthy volunteers, 10 patients with ventricular tachycardia without apparent heart disease and 15 patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction). In each subject, the three recordings were made within 25 min. The recordings were subsequently analyzed by 1) the conventional time domain method of signal-averaged ECG analysis with use of filter settings of 25 to 250 Hz and 40 to 250 Hz, 2) a spectral analysis method computing the energy area within the spectral boundaries of 40 to 140 Hz and the ratio between the energies of areas within the boundaries 40 to 140 Hz and 0 to 40 Hz, and 3) spectral temporal mapping computing the "normality factor." The study compared the reproducibility of these three approaches to the analysis of signal-averaged ECGs. First, the reproducibility of the diagnostic conclusions (that is, of the diagnosis of late potentials) was compared for the time domain method and for spectral temporal mapping. Second, the reproducibility of the numeric values of individual indexes provided by different methods was compared for all methods by computing the ratios between standard deviations of measurements in individual patients and standard deviation of all measurements. The reproducibility of diagnostic conclusions was significantly higher for the time domain method than for spectral temporal mapping (p less than 0.05, sign test). The numeric reproducibility of the normality factors produced by spectral temporal mapping was significantly lower than the numeric reproducibility of the values of all indexes provided by time domain, spectral area and spectral area ratio methods (p less than 0.05 to 0.00005, Wilcoxon tests). Spectral temporal mapping was the least reproducible method for the analysis of signal-averaged ECGs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Vazquez, E. B. Caref, F. Torres, M. Reina, A. Espina, and N. El-Sherif
Improved diagnostic value of combined time and frequency domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram after myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 385 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement