JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 2:1191-1199
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martins, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lund, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martins, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lund, D.

Distribution of local repolarization changes produced by efferent vagal stimulation in the canine ventricles

JB Martins, DP Zipes, and DD Lund

The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of effects of right and left efferent vagal stimulation on ventricular recovery properties in the in situ heart. To measure these effects in many areas simultaneously, local repolarization changes (local QT intervals) were recorded with bipolar electrodes in nine ventricular sites from 38 anesthetized dogs. In initial experiments, this method was shown to correlate with effective refractory period changes measured in the same test site after QT recording; vagal nerve stimulation prolonged the local QT interval by 1 ms for each 0.82 ms prolongation in effective refractory period (r = 0.87). Simultaneous local QT recordings during vagal nerve stimulation demonstrated uniform prolongation with two exceptions. First, left vagal efferent stimulation prolonged local QT interval in the posterior left ventricular base more than did right vagal stimulation (5.9 +/- 1.0 mean +/- standard error of the mean versus 3.7 +/- 0.9%, p less than 0.05). This probably resulted from an interaction with the left sympathetic nerves because left stellate ganglionectomy or norepinephrine infusion eliminated differences between effects of right and left vagal stimulation. Second, it was also found that vagal stimulation from either side did not prolong local QT interval time in the anterior right ventricle despite attempts to augment vagal effects with bilateral vagal stimulation alone or during isoproterenol or physostigmine administration. These regional differences in ventricular repolarization exhibited in response to efferent vagal nerve stimulation in the dog may provide a basis for understanding how autonomic influences could contribute to the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A. A Fisher and M. W Davis
Prolonged QT Interval, Syncope, and Delirium with Galantamine
Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2008; 42(2): 278 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.