Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 2:954-957
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirshfeld, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirshfeld, J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, G.

Hemodynamic changes induced by cardiac angiography with ioxaglate: comparison with diatrizoate

JW Hirshfeld Jr, W Laskey, JL Martin, WC Groh, W Untereker, and GL Wolf

The hemodynamic and electrocardiographic changes induced by left ventriculography and coronary arteriography with ioxaglate (a new low osmolality angiographic contrast agent) were characterized and compared with the changes induced by a commercial formulation of the commonly used angiographic contrast agent, diatrizoate (Renografin-76). Left ventriculography and coronary arteriography were performed in 25 patients utilizing ioxaglate and in another 25 patients utilizing diatrizoate. Both agents increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and decreased arteriovenous oxygen difference after left ventriculography, but the magnitude of the increase caused by ioxaglate was significantly less than that caused by diatrizoate (changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 5.3 +/- 1.3 mm Hg with ioxaglate and 9.5 +/- 1.5 mm Hg with diatrizoate [p less than 0.02] ). Change in arteriovenous oxygen difference was -0.33 +/- 0.19 ml/100 ml with ioxaglate and -0.85 +/- 0.13 ml/100 ml with diatrizoate (p less than 0.05). Both agents were well tolerated when used for coronary arteriography with no adverse events occurring in either group. Ioxaglate is a well tolerated cardiac angiographic contrast agent that produces less hemodynamic disturbance than diatrizoate. Accordingly, it may be particularly well suited to use in patients with impaired left ventricular function.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
R. Petersen, C. R. McKay, D. T. Kawanishi, A. Kotlewski, K. Parise, and J. C. Niland
Double-Blind Comparison of the Clinical, Hemodynamic, and Electrocardiographic Effects of Sodium Meglumine Ioxaglate or Iohexol During Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization
Angiology, September 1, 1992; 43(9): 765 - 780.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
R. L. Gold and J. C. Rios
Iatrogenic Cardiovascular Disease Secondary to Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures
J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 1987; 2(1): 49 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement