Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 2:818-825
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Rourke, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Rourke, R.

Value of noninvasive techniques for predicting early complications in patients with clinical class II acute myocardial infarction

DS Abrams, MR Starling, MH Crawford, and RA O'Rourke

Twenty-six consecutive patients with acute clinical class II myocardial infarction were prospectively evaluated to assess the ability of two-dimensional echocardiography and gated equilibrium radionuclide angiography to predict early morbidity and mortality. Within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms, right heart catheterization, two-dimensional echocardiography and radionuclide angiography were performed. Serious in-hospital complications developed in 7 patients (27%, Group I), while the remaining 19 patients (Group II) had no complications. Mean left ventricular stroke work index was the only hemodynamic variable that differed significantly between Group I and Group II (28 +/- 8 [standard deviation] vs. 39 +/- 13 g-m/m2, respectively, p less than 0.02). Also, Group I compared with Group II had a significantly lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction by two-dimensional echocardiography (26 +/- 5 vs. 51 +/- 10%, p less than 0.001) or by radionuclide angiography (29 +/- 9 vs. 46 +/- 12%, p less than 0.001). Similarly, Group I had a higher average wall motion index than Group II by both techniques (2.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.3, p less than 0.001 by two-dimensional echocardiography, and 2.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.3, p less than 0.001 by radionuclide angiography). Selected stepwise multiple regression analysis demonstrated that left ventricular ejection fraction or wall motion index, by two-dimensional echocardiography or radionuclide angiography, had additional value to a history of prior myocardial infarction for predicting in-hospital complications in patients with class II infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement