JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 2:345-350
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauernfeind, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bauernfeind, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, K.

Concordance and discordance of drug responses in atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia

RA Bauernfeind, S Swiryn, AT Petropoulos, A Coelho, J Gallastegui, and KM Rosen

Whether the results of some drug studies could be used to predict the results of other drug studies was examined during serial electrophysiologic drug testing in patients with sustained atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. The drugs studied were intravenous propranolol, 0.1 mg/kg; intravenous ouabain, 0.01 mg/kg; the combination of propranolol plus ouabain; intravenous procainamide, 0.75 to 1.5 g; oral quinidine, 1.2 to 2.4 g/day; and oral disopyramide, 0.8 to 1.6 g/day. Response was inability to induce sustained tachycardia after administration of a drug. Responses due to increased anterograde limb refractoriness. Six of 10 patients with response to propranolol plus ouabain versus 0 of 9 patients without response to this combination had response to propranolol alone (p less than 0.01). Seven of 14 patients with response to the combination versus 0 of 9 patients without response to the combination had response to ouabain alone (p less than 0.05). Responses due to increased retrograde limb refractoriness. Eight of 9 patients with response to procainamide versus 2 of 17 patients without response to this drug had response to quinidine (p less than 0.01). There was not a significant relation between response to procainamide and response to disopyramide, or between response to quinidine and response to disopyramide. Anterograde limb versus retrograde limb. There was not a significant relation between response to propranolol plus ouabain and response to any class I drug. In conclusion, there are relations between drug responses during electrophysiologic studies in patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Thus, it should be possible to simplify these studies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitati
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support
Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): e955 - e977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 6: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-73 - III-90.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.