Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 2:151-173
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kotler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kotler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J

Noninvasive evaluation of normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function

MN Kotler, GS Mintz, I Panidis, J Morganroth, BL Segal, and J Ross

Noninvasive techniques are helpful in evaluating the function of mechanical prostheses and tissue valves. Combined phonocardiography and M-mode echocardiography together with cinefluoroscopy are the most useful noninvasive techniques in differentiating normal from abnormal metallic prosthetic valve function. The intensity of the opening and closing clicks and associated murmurs will depend on the type of prosthetic valve, the heart rate and rhythm and the underlying hemodynamic status. Arrhythmias or conduction disturbances, or both, may produce motion patterns that mimic some of the echocardiographic signs of malfunctioning prosthetic valves. Differentiation of thrombus formation or tissue ingrowth from paravalvular regurgitation or dehiscence is possible by noninvasive techniques. Disc variance, a potentially serious and lethal problem with the older Beall valves, can be readily detected by cinefluoroscopy and echophonocardiography. With regard to bioprosthetic valves, two-dimensional echocardiography is superior to M-mode echocardiography in detecting primary valve failure. In addition, detection of vegetations, valve alignment and ring and individual leaflet motion can be best accomplished by two-dimensional echocardiography. Of greater importance is the patient serving as his or her own control in the follow-up assessment of prosthetic valve function by noninvasive techniques.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
M L C Vieira, M Grinberg, P M A Pomerantzeff, J L Andrade, and A J Mansur
Repeated echocardiographic examinations of patients with suspected infective endocarditis
Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 1020 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Montorsi, D. Cavoretto, M. Alimento, M. Muratori, and M. Pepi
Prosthetic Mitral Valve Thrombosis: Can Fluoroscopy Predict the Efficacy of Thrombolytic Treatment?
Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(2011): II-79 - II-84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter
Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
E. G. Cape, W. Jaarsma, and A. P. Yoganathan
Echo Doppler principles, techniques and applications for the cardiac surgeon
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 1992; 6(Supplement_1): S2 - S12.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement