Plaque disruption and the acute coronary syndromes of unstable angina and myocardial infarction: if the substrate is similar, why is the clinical presentation different?

In a majority of instances, both unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction occur secondary to plaque disruption and thrombus formation. Although the pathogenetic substrates are similar the clinical presentations are quite different. It is hypothesized in this editorial review that the amount of acute thrombus formation and specifically fibrin deposition is greater in myocardial infarction than in unstable angina. Both angiographic studies and studies analyzing the response to thrombolytic agents suggest more thrombus in myocardial infarction than in unstable angina. These data have recently been substantiated by angioscopic observations in these acute syndromes suggesting that more platelet-rich (whitish) thrombus occurs in unstable angina and more red thrombus in myocardial infarction. The red thrombus presumably would be more responsive to thrombolytic agents. Furthermore, it is proposed that these differences between syndromes in acute thrombus formation can be explained by the interplay of vessel wall injury, coagulation variables or stasis of blood flow occurring at or after the time of presentation. Therefore, acute myocardial infarction is associated with occlusive, fibrin-rich thrombus, whereas in unstable angina, the thrombus is nonocclusive, mural and possibly more platelet-rich. However, the clinical syndrome that ultimately develops after plaque disruption is dependent not only on the amount of acute thrombus formation but on the net result of all factors that influence the balance between coronary blood supply and myocardial oxygen demand.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Motoyama, T. Kondo, M. Sarai, A. Sugiura, H. Harigaya, T. Sato, K. Inoue, M. Okumura, J. Ishii, H. Anno, et al. Multislice Computed Tomographic Characteristics of Coronary Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 24, 2007; 50(4): 319 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Schulman Antiplatelet Therapy in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes JAMA, October 20, 2004; 292(15): 1875 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Okamatsu, M. Takano, S. Sakai, F. Ishibashi, R. Uemura, T. Takano, and K. Mizuno Elevated Troponin T Levels and Lesion Characteristics in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, February 3, 2004; 109(4): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M K Sinha, D Roy, D C Gaze, P O Collinson, and J-C Kaski Role of "Ischemia Modified Albumin", a new biochemical marker of myocardial ischaemia, in the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 29 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. Wong, R. P. Giugliano, and E. M. Antman Use of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins in the Management of Acute Coronary Artery Syndromes and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention JAMA, January 15, 2003; 289(3): 331 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Marzilli, G. Sambuceti, S. Fedele, and A. L'Abbate Coronary microcirculatory vasoconstriction during ischemia in patients with unstable angina J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2000; 35(2): 327 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Ambrose and G. Dangas Unstable Angina: Current Concepts of Pathogenesis and Treatment Arch Intern Med, January 10, 2000; 160(1): 25 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Zaacks, P. R. Liebson, J. E. Calvin, J. E. Parrillo, and L. W. Klein Unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: does the clinical diagnosis have therapeutic implications? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 107 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]