JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 19:1402-1409
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zarco, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zarco, P

Midterm outcome of patients with asymptomatic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty

RA Hernandez, C Macaya, A Iniguez, F Alfonso, J Goicolea, A Fernandez-Ortiz, and P Zarco

Cardiopulmonary Department, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Although many patients with restenosis after balloon coronary angioplasty have recurrence of angina, others remain asymptomatic. To assess the clinical implications of asymptomatic coronary restenosis, we analyzed clinical and angiographic characteristics of 277 consecutive patients with restenosis, 133 (48%) of whom were asymptomatic (group I) and 144 (52%) symptomatic (group II). Restenosis was documented 6 to 9 months after the index procedure, or earlier if angina recurred, and was defined as a greater than 50% lumen narrowing (visual estimation). Group I (asymptomatic group) included fewer female (9% vs. 18%, p less than 0.05) and hypertensive patients (38% vs. 56%, p less than 0.005) and more patients with a previous myocardial infarction (48% vs. 28%, p less than 0.05) and single-vessel disease (67% vs. 55%, p less than 0.05). Before angioplasty, symptoms had lasted for a shorter period (10 +/- 25 vs. 23 +/- 42 months, p less than 0.001), ischemia after a recent infarction was a more frequent indication (21% vs. 10%, p less than 0.05) and total revascularization more frequently obtained (74% vs. 63%, p less than 0.05) in group I than in group II patients. Only a normal blood pressure, previous myocardial infarction, single-vessel disease and a shorter duration of symptoms were independent correlates of asymptomatic restenosis. No differences were found in stenosis severity before angioplasty (90% in both groups) or after angioplasty (22% +/- 12% vs. 24% +/- 16%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. Salahas, A. Vrahatis, I. Karabinos, I. Antonellis, G. Ifantis, I. Gavaliatsis, P. Anthopoulos, and A. Tavernarakis
Success, Safety, and Efficacy of Implantation of Diamond-Like Carbon-Coated Stents
Angiology, April 1, 2007; 58(2): 203 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. N. Giedd and S. R. Bergmann
Myocardial perfusion imaging following percutaneous coronary intervention: the importance of restenosis, disease progression, and directed reintervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 328 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. N. Levine, M. J. Kern, P. B. Berger, D. L. Brown, L. W. Klein, D. J. Kereiakes, T. A. Sanborn, A. K. Jacobs, and for the American Heart Association Diagnostic and
Management of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
Ann Intern Med, July 15, 2003; 139(2): 123 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Bergmann and K. N. Giedd
Silent ischemia: unsafe at any time
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 2, 2003; 42(1): 41 - 44.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. N. Ruygrok, M. W.I. Webster, V. de Valk, G.-A. van Es, J. A. Ormiston, M.-A. M. Morel, and P. W. Serruys
Clinical and Angiographic Factors Associated With Asymptomatic Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Circulation, November 6, 2001; 104(19): 2289 - 2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Krone, R. M. Hardison, B. R. Chaitman, R. J. Gibbons, G. Sopko, R. Bach, and K. M. Detre
Risk stratification after successful coronary revascularization: the lack of a role for routine exercise testing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2001; 38(1): 136 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A Wahl, M Billinger, M Fleisch, B Meier, and C Seiler
Quantitatively assessed coronary collateral circulation and restenosis following percutaneous revascularization
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2000; 21(21): 1776 - 1784.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. A. Ormiston, F. M. Stewart, A. H. G. Roche, B. J. Webber, R. M. L. Whitlock, and M. W. I. Webster
Late Regression of the Dilated Site After Coronary Angioplasty : A 5-Year Quantitative Angiographic Study
Circulation, July 15, 1997; 96(2): 468 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. V. Anderson
Estrogen Therapy, Atherosclerosis, and Clinical Cardiovascular Events
Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1809 - 1811.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Kimura, H. Yokoi, Y. Nakagawa, T. Tamura, S. Kaburagi, Y. Sawada, Y. Sato, H. Yokoi, N. Hamasaki, H. Nosaka, et al.
Three-Year Follow-Up after Implantation of Metallic Coronary-Artery Stents
N. Engl. J. Med., February 29, 1996; 334(9): 561 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. Landau, R. A. Lange, and L. D. Hillis
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
N. Engl. J. Med., April 7, 1994; 330(14): 981 - 993.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.