JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 19:780-788
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fogoros, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chenarides, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fogoros, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chenarides, J.

Long-term outcome of survivors of cardiac arrest whose therapy is guided by electrophysiologic testing

RN Fogoros, JJ Elson, CA Bonnet, SB Fiedler, and JG Chenarides

Division of Cardiology, Allegheny General Hospital, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh 15212.

The long-term outcome of 217 consecutive survivors of cardiac arrest whose therapy was guided by electrophysiologic testing was analyzed. After electrophysiologic testing, 81 patients (37%) were classified as having no inducible arrhythmia and were treated without antiarrhythmic drugs; 23 received an implantable defibrillator. Of the 136 patients with inducible arrhythmia, the 51 (38%) who responded to serial drug testing were treated with the successful drug and the 85 (62%) with unsuccessful drug testing were treated with an implantable defibrillator (47 patients), amiodarone (36 patients) or drugs that were unsuccessful during testing (2 patients). The mean follow-up interval for all patients was 35 +/- 23 months. The actuarial incidence of sudden death and overall death was similar for patients whose arrhythmias were not inducible, drug responders and nonresponders. The actuarial incidence rate of recurrent arrhythmic events in nonresponders was 35 +/- 5% and 53 +/- 7% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. These values were significantly lower (and statistically similar to each other) in the other two patient groups: patients with noninducible arrhythmia (19 +/- 5% and 31 +/- 7%, respectively, p less than 0.05) and drug responders (13 +/- 5% and 23 +/- 8%, respectively, p less than 0.01). Patients with an implantable defibrillator who had recurrent arrhythmic events were significantly less likely to die suddenly than were patients without a defibrillator who had recurrent events (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Cappato, S. Boczor, K.-H. Kuck, and on behalf of the CASH Investigators
Response to programmed ventricular stimulation and clinical outcome in cardiac arrest survivors receiving randomised assignment to implantable cardioverter defibrillator or antiarrhythmic drug therapy
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2004; 25(8): 642 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. H. Raitt, E. G. Renfroe, A. E. Epstein, J. H. McAnulty, P. Mounsey, J. S. Steinberg, S. E. Lancaster, R. L. Jadonath, and A. P. Hallstrom
"Stable" Ventricular Tachycardia Is Not a Benign Rhythm : Insights From the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Registry
Circulation, January 16, 2001; 103(2): 244 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Mehta, J. Curwin, J. A. Gomes, and V. Fuster
Sudden Death in Coronary Artery Disease : Acute Ischemia Versus Myocardial Substrate
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 3215 - 3223.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.