Effect of acetylcholine on the highly stenotic coronary artery: difference between the constrictor response of the infarct-related coronary artery and that of the noninfarct-related artery

Division of Cardiology, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

To examine the constrictor response of the infarct-related stenotic coronary artery in comparison with that of noninfarct-related stenotic arteries, acetylcholine in maximal doses of 100 micrograms for the left and 50 micrograms for the right coronary artery was injected into the 16 infarct-related coronary arteries of 16 patients with previous myocardial infarction (group 1) and into 19 stenotic coronary arteries of 16 patients with stable angina without myocardial infarction (group 2). Acetylcholine's effects on lumen diameter and area were quantitatively analyzed at the stenotic segment and its proximal segment without significant stenosis. Acetylcholine decreased lumen diameter and area at the stenotic segments from 0.72 +/- 0.18 to 0.18 +/- 0.33 mm and from 0.45 +/- 0.22 to 0.10 +/- 0.22 mm2, respectively, in group 1 (both p less than 0.01) and from 0.75 +/- 0.22 to 0.49 +/- 0.30 mm and 0.48 +/- 0.29 to 0.26 +/- 0.23 mm2, respectively, in group 2 (both p less than 0.01). Acetylcholine decreased the diameter and area at the proximal segment from 2.71 +/- 0.75 to 2.38 +/- 0.6 mm and from 6.18 +/- 3.4 to 4.71 +/- 2.23 mm2, respectively, in group 1 (both p less than 0.01) and from 2.31 +/- 0.67 to 1.95 +/- 0.59 mm and from 4.5 +/- 2.97 to 3.22 +/- 1.96 mm2, respectively, in group 2 (both p less than 0.01). The changes in diameter and area at the stenotic segment in group 1 were significantly greater than those in group 2 (both p less than 0.01); there were no significant differences between groups in the changes at the proximal segment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. E. Deanfield, J. P. Halcox, and T. J. Rabelink Endothelial Function and Dysfunction: Testing and Clinical Relevance Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1285 - 1295. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Waxman, F. Ishibashi, and J. E. Muller Detection and Treatment of Vulnerable Plaques and Vulnerable Patients: Novel Approaches to Prevention of Coronary Events Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2390 - 2411. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. K. Mishra Variations in presentation and various options in management of variant angina Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 748 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Heiss, T. Lauer, A. Dejam, P. Kleinbongard, S. Hamada, T. Rassaf, S. Matern, M. Feelisch, and M. Kelm Plasma Nitroso Compounds Are Decreased in Patients With Endothelial Dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 573 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Patti, V. Pasceri, R. Melfi, C. Goffredo, M. Chello, A. D'Ambrosio, R. Montesanti, and G. Di Sciascio Impaired Flow-Mediated Dilation and Risk of Restenosis in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation Circulation, January 4, 2005; 111(1): 70 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Brevetti, A. Silvestro, V. Schiano, and M. Chiariello Endothelial Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Additive Value of Flow-Mediated Dilation to Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index Circulation, October 28, 2003; 108(17): 2093 - 2098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Widlansky, N. Gokce, J. F. Keaney Jr, and J. A. Vita The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2003; 42(7): 1149 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Vita and J. F. Keaney Jr Endothelial Function: A Barometer for Cardiovascular Risk? Circulation, August 6, 2002; 106(6): 640 - 642. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Iraculis, A. Cequier, J. A. Gomez-Hospital, M. Sabate, J. Mauri, E. Fernandez-Nofrerias, B. Garcia del Blanco, F. Jara, and E. Esplugas Early dysfunction and long-term improvement in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the infarct-related artery after thrombolysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2002; 40(2): 257 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Pristipino, J. F. Beltrame, M. L. Finocchiaro, R. Hattori, M. Fujita, R. Mongiardo, D. Cianflone, T. Sanna, S. Sasayama, and A. Maseri Major Racial Differences in Coronary Constrictor Response Between Japanese and Caucasians With Recent Myocardial Infarction Circulation, March 14, 2000; 101(10): 1102 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Beltrame, S. Sasayama, and A. Maseri Racial heterogeneity in coronary artery vasomotor reactivity: differences between Japanese and caucasian patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1442 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Marchioli, R. M. Marfisi, F. Carinci, and G. Tognoni Meta-analysis, Clinical Trials, and Transferability of Research Results Into Practice: The Case of Cholesterol-Lowering Interventions in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Arch Intern Med, June 10, 1996; 156(11): 1158 - 1172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. N. Levine, B. Frei, S. N. Koulouris, M. D. Gerhard, J. F. Keaney Jr, and J. A. Vita Ascorbic Acid Reverses Endothelial Vasomotor Dysfunction in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, March 15, 1996; 93(6): 1107 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Gerhard and P. Ganz How Do We Explain the Clinical Benefits of Estrogen? : From Bedside to Bench Circulation, July 1, 1995; 92(1): 5 - 8. [Full Text]