Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 19:647-653
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gacioch, G.
Right arrow Articles by Topol, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gacioch, G.
Right arrow Articles by Topol, E.

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the use of coronary angioplasty and the integration of the new support devices into patient management

GM Gacioch, SG Ellis, L Lee, ER Bates, M Kirsh, JA Walton, and EJ Topol

Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Conventional therapy for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction continues to be associated with a high in-hospital mortality rate. Hemodynamic support with new mechanical devices and emergency coronary revascularization may alter the long-term prognosis for patients with this complication. Between July 1985 and March 1990, 68 patients presented to the University of Michigan with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Interventions performed included thrombolytic therapy (46%), intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation (70%), cardiac catheterization (86%), coronary angioplasty (73%), emergency coronary artery bypass grafting/ventricular septal defect repair (15%), Hemopump insertion (11%), percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (4%) and ventricular assist device (3%). The 30-day survival rate was significantly better in patients who had successful angioplasty of the infarct-related artery than in patients with failed angioplasty (61% vs. 7%, p = 0.002) or no attempt at angioplasty (61% vs. 14%, p = 0.003). This difference was maintained over the 1-year follow-up period. The only clinical variable that predicted survival was age less than 65 years. The early use of the new support devices in 10 patients was associated with death in 8 (80%), but this poor outcome may reflect a selection bias for an especially high risk population. Collectively, these recent data continue to suggest that emergency revascularization with angioplasty may reduce the mortality rate, but further study is required to define optimal utilization and integration of new support devices.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. J. Goldberg, F. A. Spencer, J. M. Gore, D. Lessard, and J. Yarzebski
Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Perspective
Circulation, March 10, 2009; 119(9): 1211 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
I. George and M. C. Oz
Myocardial Revascularization after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 669 - 696.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. D. White, S. F. Assmann, T. A. Sanborn, A. K. Jacobs, J. G. Webb, L. A. Sleeper, C.-K. Wong, J. T. Stewart, P. E.G. Aylward, S.-C. Wong, et al.
Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results From the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) Trial
Circulation, September 27, 2005; 112(13): 1992 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. P. Bouki, G. Pavlakis, and E. Papasteriadis
Management of Cardiogenic Shock Due to Acute Coronary Syndromes
Angiology, March 1, 2005; 56(2): 123 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A G C Sutton, P Finn, J A Hall, A A Harcombe, R A Wright, and M A de Belder
Predictors of outcome after percutaneous treatment for cardiogenic shock
Heart, March 1, 2005; 91(3): 339 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G Montalescot, H R Andersen, D Antoniucci, A Betriu, M J de Boer, L Grip, F J Neumann, and M T Rothman
Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction
Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): e37 - e37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. Dzavik, L.A. Sleeper, T.P. Cocke, M. Moscucci, J. Saucedo, S. Hosat, X. Jiang, J. Slater, T. LeJemtel, J.S. Hochman, et al.
Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2003; 24(9): 828 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
D. C. Lee, W. Ting, and M. C. Oz
Myocardial Revascularization after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 639 - 658.
[Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
I M Barbash, S Behar, A Battler, D Hasdai, V Boyko, S Gottlieb, and J Leor
Management and outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without on-site catheterisation facilities
Heart, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 145 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
C.H. Davies
Revascularization for cardiogenic shock
QJM, February 1, 2001; 94(2): 57 - 67.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. S. Hochman, L. A. Sleeper, H. D. White, V. Dzavik, S. C. Wong, V. Menon, J. G. Webb, R. Steingart, M. H. Picard, M. A. Menegus, et al.
One-Year Survival Following Early Revascularization for Cardiogenic Shock
JAMA, January 10, 2001; 285(2): 190 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. C. Wong, T. Sanborn, L. A. Sleeper, J. G. Webb, R. Pilchik, D. Hart, S. Mejnartowicz, T. A. Antonelli, R. Lange, J. K. French, et al.
Angiographic findings and clinical correlates in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3_Suppl_A): 1077 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. G. Webb, L. A. Sleeper, C. E. Buller, J. Boland, A. Palazzo, E. Buller, H. D. White, J. S. Hochman, and for the SHOCK Investigators
Implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3_Suppl_A): 1084 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. M. Shindler, S. T. Palmeri, T. A. Antonelli, L. A. Sleeper, J. Boland, T. P. Cocke, J. S. Hochman, and for the SHOCK Investigators
Diabetes mellitus in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3_Suppl_A): 1097 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S G Williams, D J Wright, and L B Tan
Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: towards evidence based medical practice
Heart, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 621 - 626.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. S. Sweeney
The Hemopump in 1997: a clinical, political, and marketing evolution
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 68(2): 761 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. M. Hollenberg, C. J. Kavinsky, and J. E. Parrillo
Cardiogenic Shock
Ann Intern Med, July 6, 1999; 131(1): 47 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. Itoh, K. Fukami, S. Oriso, J. Umemura, J. Nakajima, H. Obonai, K. Hiramori, and K. Fukami
Survival Following Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Acute Left Main Coronary Artery Total Occlusion: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Angiology, February 1, 1997; 48(2): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. H. Eckman, J. B. Wong, D. N. Salem, and S. G. Pauker
Direct Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review of Outcomes in Clinical Subsets
Ann Intern Med, October 15, 1992; 117(8): 667 - 676.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
PTCA FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK AFTER MI
Journal Watch (General), March 13, 1992; 1992(313): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement