Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1992; 19:341-346
© 1992 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haisty, W.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haisty, W., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G.

Performance of the automated complete Selvester QRS scoring system in normal subjects and patients with single and multiple myocardial infarctions

WK Haisty Jr, O Pahlm, NB Wagner, JE Pope, and GS Wagner

Department of Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103.

The automated version of the complete Selvester QRS scoring system for estimation of myocardial infarct size was evaluated in 1,344 normal subjects, 706 patients with a single myocardial infarction (366 with inferior infarction, 277 with anterior infarction and 63 with posterolateral infarction) and 131 patients with combined inferior and anterior infarction. The presence and location were determined by angiographic and ventriculographic criteria. The performance of the overall 32-point system, each of the 19 criteria and the 13 criteria sets and each of the 35 criteria within the 13 sets was examined. The mean point scores were 1.7 for normal subjects, 3.7 for posterolateral infarction, 4.1 for inferior infarction, 6.3 for anterior infarction and 6.9 for multiple infarcts. A score greater than 4 yielded a sensitivity of 67% for anterior infarction, 41% for inferior infarction, 32% for posterolateral infarction and 72% for multiple infarcts. However, 7 of 32 criteria failed to achieve 95% specificity and 10 of 35 criteria in criteria sets had a sensitivity that was even lower than their false positive rate. The automated Selvester QRS scoring system currently has limitations that are attributable to development of the original system, which used manual scoring techniques and established criteria limits from middle-aged men. Future automated analysis should use gender- and age-dependent criteria limits.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
N. Herring and D.J. Paterson
ECG diagnosis of acute ischaemia and infarction: past, present and future
QJM, April 1, 2006; 99(4): 219 - 230.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. S. Douglas
Citius, altius, fortius (the olympic motto: swifter, higher, stronger)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 150 - 151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C.-K. Wong, J.K. French, J. Andrews, M.J. Frey, A.A.J. Adgey, P.E. Aylward, and H.D. White
Usefulness of the presenting electrocardiogram in predicting myocardial salvage with thrombolytic therapy in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2002; 23(5): 399 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. T. Hasche, C. Fernandes, S. B. Freedman, and R. W. Jeremy
Relation Between Ischemia Time, Infarct Size, and Left Ventricular Function in Humans
Circulation, August 15, 1995; 92(4): 710 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement