Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves

Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular, Surgery Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

To evaluate the normal range of Doppler-derived velocities and gradients, their relation to direct flow measurements and the importance of prosthetic valve design on the relation between Doppler and catheter-derived gradients, five sizes of normal St. Jude bileaflet, Medtronic-Hall tilting disc, Starr-Edwards caged ball and Hancock bioprosthetic aortic valves were studied with use of a pulsatile flow model. A strong linear correlation between peak velocity and peak flow, and mean velocity and mean flow, was found in all four valve types (r = 0.96 to 0.99). In small St. Jude and Hancock valves, Doppler velocities and corresponding gradients increased dramatically with increasing flow, resulting in velocities and gradients as high as 4.7 m/s and 89 mm Hg, respectively. The ratio of velocity across the valve to velocity in front of the valve (velocity ratio) was independent of flow in all St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves when the two lowest flow rates were excluded for Hancock valves. Although Doppler peak and mean gradients correlated well with catheter peak and mean gradients in all four valve types, the actual agreement between the two techniques was acceptable only in Hancock and Medtronic-Hall valves. For St. Jude and Starr-Edwards valves, Doppler gradients significantly and consistently exceeded catheter gradients with differences as great as 44 mm Hg. Thus, Doppler velocities and gradients across normal prosthetic heart valves are highly flow dependent. However, the velocity ratio is independent of flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Spethmann, H. Dreger, S. Schattke, G. Baldenhofer, D. Saghabalyan, V. Stangl, M. Laule, G. Baumann, K. Stangl, and F. Knebel Doppler haemodynamics and effective orifice areas of Edwards SAPIEN and CoreValve transcatheter aortic valves Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, February 3, 2012; (2012) jes021v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Stewart and L. L. Rodriguez Avoiding Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch: Is TAVI a New Solution? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., October 1, 2011; 4(10): 1063 - 1066. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Price, H. Lapierre, L. Ressler, B.-K. Lam, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Prosthesis-patient mismatch is less frequent and more clinically indolent in patients operated for aortic insufficiency J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 639 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kulik, N. T. Kouchoukos, and M. Ruel Avoiding Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in the Elderly: Options Other Than Mechanical Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 1049 - 1050. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kulik, V. Kapila, T. G. Mesana, M. Ruel, and I. G. Burwash Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Long-Term Outcomes After Valve Replacement for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch" Circulation, December 5, 2006; 114(23): e628 - e628. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kulik, I. G. Burwash, V. Kapila, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Long-Term Outcomes After Valve Replacement for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-553 - I-558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ruel, H. Al-Faleh, A. Kulik, K. L. Chan, T. G. Mesana, and I. G. Burwash Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1036 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R J Edwards, M Al-Bustami, and C D J Ilsley A novel method of assessing Starr-Edwards aortic valve stenosis Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1479 - 1480. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Murday, A. Hochstitzky, J. Mansfield, J. Miles, B. Taylor, E. Whitley, and T. Treasure A prospective controlled trial of st. jude versus starr edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Levine and E. Schwammenthal Stenosis is in the eye of the observer: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aortic valve area J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 443 - 445. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Vitale, I. Caldarera, C. Muneretto, R. Sinatra, A. Scafuri, E. Di Rosa, A. Contini, N. Tedesco, A. Pierangeli, M. Abbate, et al. Clinical evaluation of St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus versus standard aortic valve prostheses: The Italian multicenter, prospective, randomized study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 691 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, I. Wallentin, P. Ask, and B. Wranne Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: An in vivo and in vitro study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 287 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ismeno, A. Renzulli, M. De Feo, A. Della Corte, F. E. Covino, and M. Cotrufo Standard versus hemodynamic plus 19-mm St Jude Medical aortic valves J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 723 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1131 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Khan, R. J. Siegel, M. A. DeRobertis, C. E. Blanche, R. M. Kass, W. Cheng, G. P. Fontana, and A. Trento Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 531 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, B. Wall, P. Myken, S. Larsson, and I. Wallentin INFLUENCE OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT, PROSTHESIS TYPE, AND SIZEON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND VENTRICULAR MASS IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1999; 118(1): 57 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Baumgartner, T. Stefenelli, J. Niederberger, H. Schima, and G. Maurer "overestimation" of catheter gradients by doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1655 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Y. Leung, J. Wong, L. Rodriguez, M. Pu, P. M. Vandervoort, and J. D. Thomas Application of Color Doppler Flow Mapping to Calculate Orifice Area of St Jude Mitral Valve Circulation, September 22, 1998; 98(12): 1205 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, G. M. De Matteis, E. Caprara, F. Tomai, A. P. de Peppo, P. Polisca, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello EXTENT AND PATTERN OF REGRESSION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL SIZE CARBOMEDICS AORTIC VALVES J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1997; 113(5): 901 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Niederberger, H. Schima, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Importance of Pressure Recovery for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Ultrasound: Role of Aortic Size, Aortic Valve Area, and Direction of the Stenotic Jet In Vitro Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1934 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. Carrel, U. Zingg, R. Jenni, B. Aeschbacher, and M. I. Turina Early In Vivo Experience With the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical Heart Valves in Patients With Narrowed Aortic Annulus Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1418 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Laske, R. Jenni, M. Maloigne, G. Vassalli, O. Bertel, and M. I. Turina Pressure Gradients Across Bileaflet Aortic Valves by Direct Measurement and Echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 48 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. M. Vandervoort, N. L. Greenberg, M. Pu, K. A. Powell, D. M. Cosgrove, and J. D. Thomas Pressure Recovery in Bileaflet Heart Valve Prostheses : Localized High Velocities and Gradients in Central and Side Orifices With Implications for Doppler-Catheter Gradient Relation in Aortic and Mitral Position Circulation, December 15, 1995; 92(12): 3464 - 3472. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, F. Russo, F. Tomai, A. Tondo, C. Pagliaricci, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic anulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1994; 108(1): 57 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. M. Bojar, H. Rastegar, D. D. Payne, C. A. Mack, and S. L. Schwartz Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1993; 56(5): 1141 - 1147. [Abstract] [PDF]