JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1991; 18:1661-1670
© 1991 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isaaz, K
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isaaz, K
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, N.

Demonstration of postvalvuloplasty hemodynamic improvement in aortic stenosis based on Doppler measurement of valvular resistance

K Isaaz, L Munoz, T Ports, and NB Schiller

Department of Cardiology, University of Nancy, France.

It was recently suggested that valvular resistance, defined as the pressure gradient/flow rate ratio, may better depict the hemodynamic impairment in aortic stenosis than does valve area. The relation between aortic valve resistance and left ventricular mechanics was studied with Doppler echocardiography in 13 patients (mean age 85 years) with severe aortic stenosis who underwent percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty. The Doppler-estimated peak valvular resistance, defined as the ratio of peak transvalvular pressure gradient to peak valvular flow rate, decreased from 510 +/- 190 dynes.s.cm-5 before valvuloplasty to 300 +/- 110 dynes.s.cm-5 after the procedure (p = 0.0001). There was a close linear relation between valvular resistance measured at catheterization and Doppler-derived peak valvular resistance (r = 0.91). After valvuloplasty, left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 53 +/- 13% to 62 +/- 11% (p = 0.0001). The percent increase in ejection fraction was linearly related to the percent decrease in end-systolic wall stress (r = 0.56), which was in turn related to the percent decrease in peak valvular resistance (r = 0.75). No such linear relation existed between the percent changes in valve area and those in end-systolic wall stress. In conclusion, hemodynamic improvement after valvuloplasty is more closely related to changes in valvular resistance than to changes in valvular area. It is suggested that valvular resistance can be estimated accurately by Doppler echocardiography with use of a simple method and should be a primary consideration in assessing the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
F ANTONINI-CANTERIN, P FAGGIANO, D ZANUTTINI, and F RIBICHINI
Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis?
Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 9 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S Takeda, H Rimington, and J Chambers
The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis
Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 11 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.