|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1991; 18:1445-1451 © 1991 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia.
The effect of the Palmaz-Schatz stent on the angiographic appearance and residual luminal stenosis in patients with intimal dissection after balloon angioplasty was evaluated in 84 consecutive patients (90 lesions). Coronary angiography was performed before angioplasty, after conventional angioplasty and after stent implantation. The degree of intimal disruption was assessed as follows: grade 0, no dissection; grade 1, simple dissection (intraluminal linear defect or extraluminal cap extravasation); or grade 2, complex dissection (nonlinear spiral defect or luminal defect with multiple irregular borders). Quantitative coronary analysis of digitized cineangiograms was performed with use of a computerized automatic edge detection algorithm. After balloon angioplasty, 31 (34%) of 90 lesions demonstrated intimal dissection (18 simple, 13 complex). After stent implantation, intimal dissection improved by greater than or equal to 1 grade in 29 (94%) of the 31 lesions with 27 (87%) reduced to grade 0 (that is, no dissection). Dissection grade improved after stenting in 16 (89%) of 18 simple dissections and in all 13 complex dissections. Mean diameter stenosis was 77 +/- 17% before angioplasty, 47 +/- 17% after angioplasty and 14 +/- 10% after stenting (before angioplasty vs. after angioplasty and after angioplasty vs. after stenting, p less than 0.0001). In conclusion, intracoronary stenting is effective in reducing the residual luminal stenosis and in improving the angiographic appearance of intimal dissections after conventional balloon angioplasty.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. J. Dzau, E. M. Antman, H. R. Black, D. L. Hayes, J. E. Manson, J. Plutzky, J. J. Popma, and W. Stevenson The Cardiovascular Disease Continuum Validated: Clinical Evidence of Improved Patient Outcomes: Part I: Pathophysiology and Clinical Trial Evidence (Risk Factors Through Stable Coronary Artery Disease) Circulation, December 19, 2006; 114(25): 2850 - 2870. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cejna, J. M. Breuss, H. Bergmeister, R. de Martin, Z. Xu, M. Grgurin, U. Losert, H. Plenk Jr, B. R. Binder, and J. Lammer Inhibition of Neointimal Formation after Stent Placement with Adenovirus-mediated Gene Transfer of I{kappa}B{alpha} in the Hypercholesterolemic Rabbit Model: Initial Results Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 702 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Johansson, H. Olsson, and B. Wennerblom Angiography-Guided Routine Coronary Stent Implantation Results in Suboptimal Dilatation Angiology, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 69 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Savage, J. S. Douglas, D. L. Fischman, C. J. Pepine, S. B. King, J. A. Werner, S. R. Bailey, P. A. Overlie, S. H. Fenton, J. A. Brinker, et al. Stent Placement Compared with Balloon Angioplasty for Obstructed Coronary Bypass Grafts N. Engl. J. Med., September 11, 1997; 337(11): 740 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Fischman, M. B. Leon, D. S. Baim, R. A. Schatz, M. P. Savage, I. Penn, K. Detre, L. Veltri, D. Ricci, M. Nobuyoshi, et al. A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease N. Engl. J. Med., August 25, 1994; 331(8): 496 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |