Errors in pressure gradient measurement by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound: type, size and age effects in bioprosthetic aortic valves

Cardiac Surgery and Biostatistics Branches, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

The accuracy of continuous wave Doppler ultrasound in deriving pressure gradients across bioprosthetic heart valves was evaluated in an in vitro pulse duplicator. Simultaneous pressure transducer and Doppler measurements were made in new and explanted aortic bioprosthetic valves of several sizes and four types: Carpentier-Edwards, Ionescu-Shiley, Hancock standard and Hancock modified. The mean and peak gradients calculated by the modified Bernoulli equation from Doppler velocity measurements were always greater than those measured manometrically, despite corrections for location dependence of the manometric gradient (or pressure recovery). The relation between manometric and ultrasonically determined gradient was found to be statistically dependent on the valve type (mean gradient p less than 0.0001; peak gradient p = 0.0003) and size (mean gradient p = 0.0089; peak gradient p = 0.0107). Effects of implantation were observed, but were not shown to be significant. It is concluded that the continuous wave Doppler velocity data overestimated prosthetic valve pressure gradient in all cases, even when pressure recovery was taken into account. Clinicians should be wary of Doppler data when making major diagnostic or therapeutic decisions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Enriquez-Sarano, V. T. Nkomo, and H. Michelena Principles and Practice of Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 315 - 348. [Full Text]

				M. S. Firstenberg, P. M. Vandervoort, N. L. Greenberg, N. G. Smedira, P. M. McCarthy, M. J. Garcia, and J. D. Thomas Noninvasive estimation of transmitral pressure drop across the normal mitral valve in humans: importance of convective and inertial forces during left ventricular filling J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1942 - 1949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, and K.-R. Karsch Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, B. Wall, P. Myken, S. Larsson, and I. Wallentin INFLUENCE OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT, PROSTHESIS TYPE, AND SIZEON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND VENTRICULAR MASS IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1999; 118(1): 57 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Laske, R. Jenni, M. Maloigne, G. Vassalli, O. Bertel, and M. I. Turina Pressure Gradients Across Bileaflet Aortic Valves by Direct Measurement and Echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 48 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text]