Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1991; 18:443-450
© 1991 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasperetti, C.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gasperetti, C.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, E.

Influence of contrast media on thrombus formation during coronary angioplasty

CM Gasperetti, MD Feldman, LR Burwell, DA Angello, KH Haugh, RM Owen, and ER Powers

Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

The influence of contrast media on thrombus formation during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was assessed in 124 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angioplasty and receiving either ionic (n = 57) (Group I) or nonionic (n = 67) (Group II) contrast medium. The presence of thrombus was assessed by qualitative analysis of angiograms in identical pre- and postangioplasty projections by four observers who had no knowledge of other data. Quantitation of stenosis severity before and after angioplasty and qualitative analysis of lesion eccentricity and complexity and of the presence of dissection were also performed. Although the baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups (including presenting syndromes and procedural and angiographic variables) did not differ, more patients in Group II than Group I developed new thrombus during coronary angioplasty (18% vs. 4%, p less than 0.02). In particular, patients with a presenting syndrome of recent myocardial infarction or rest angina, or both, and patients with an eccentric coronary plaque were more likely to develop new thrombus if they received nonionic than if they received ionic contrast medium (p less than 0.05). Patients with new thrombus formation and patients with thrombus present both before and after angioplasty had a high incidence of acute procedural complications (36% and 23%, respectively). Patients in Groups I and II had a similar incidence of ischemic events during follow-up.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. I. Qureshi
Editorial Comment--Thromboembolic Events During Neuroendovascular Procedures
Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1728 - 1729.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B Scheller, B Hennen, A Pohl, H Schieffer, and T Markwirth
Acute and subacute stent occlusion; risk-reduction by ionic contrast media
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2001; 22(5): 385 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. J. Davidson, W. K. Laskey, J. B. Hermiller, J. K. Harrison, W. Matthai Jr, R. E. Vlietstra, J. A. Brinker, D. J. Kereiakes, J. B. Muhlestein, A. Lansky, et al.
Randomized Trial of Contrast Media Utilization in High-Risk PTCA : The COURT Trial
Circulation, May 9, 2000; 101(18): 2172 - 2177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement