cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1991; 17:1326-1333
© 1991 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moulinier, L
Right arrow Articles by Sebastian, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moulinier, L
Right arrow Articles by Sebastian, A

Measurement of aortic blood flow by Doppler echocardiography: day to day variability in normal subjects and applicability in clinical research

L Moulinier, T Venet, NB Schiller, TW Kurtz, RC Morris Jr, and A Sebastian

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

To assess the reliability of Doppler ultrasound for detecting serial changes in cardiac output in response to experimental interventions, the day to day variability of the minute distance of aortic flow was determined in seven normal subjects maintained in a tightly controlled environment with regard to diet and activities. Measurements were made at the same time on 5 to 6 sequential days from an apical window with use of both continuous wave and pulsed wave Doppler techniques. Two statistical measures of reliability were calculated, the intraclass coefficient of correlation (R), which varies between 0 (null reliability) and +1 (perfect reliability), and the 95% confidence interval for the error-free value of a single measurement. For sequential measurements of arterial pressure, 24 h urinary volume and sodium excretion and body weight, the intraclass coefficients of correlation ranged from 0.85 to 0.99, indicating low day to day variability consistent with tight environmental control. Continuous and pulsed wave modes were proved equally and highly reliable for measuring minute distance of aortic flow. However, continuous wave Doppler ultrasound provided acceptable signals more frequently than did the pulsed wave technique. For continuous wave Doppler ultrasound, R was 0.87 (p less than 0.00001); the 95% confidence interval was +/- 1.81 m/min (or 11% of the mean of all measurements), which indicates that this method can be used in a single individual to detect a greater than 11% change in minute distance measured once before and after an intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
G P Armstrong, S G Carlier, K Fukamachi, J D Thomas, and T H Marwick
Estimation of cardiac reserve by peak power: validation and initial application of a simplified index
Heart, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 357 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. S. Mueller, K. Chatterjee, K. B. Davis, M. A. Fifer, C. Franklin, M. A. Greenberg, A. J. Labovitz, P. K. Shah, K. J. Tuman, M. H. Weil, et al.
Present use of bedside right heart catheterization in patients with cardiac disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 840 - 864.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. T. Naughton, M. A. Rahman, K. Hara, J. S. Floras, and T. D. Bradley
Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Intrathoracic and Left Ventricular Transmural Pressures in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure
Circulation, March 15, 1995; 91(6): 1725 - 1731.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home