A randomized comparison of the nephrotoxicity of iopamidol and diatrizoate in high risk patients undergoing cardiac angiography

Division of Cardiovascular Disease and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Three hundred seven high risk patients with renal impairment (serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dl) were randomized in a double-blind manner to either iopamidol (a nonionic, low osmolar radiocontrast agent) or diatrizoate (a conventional radiocontrast agent) at cardiac angiography with subsequent follow-up study of renal function. Baseline clinical and angiographic variables were similar in the iopamidol (n = 155) and diatrizoate (n = 152) groups. Change in renal function after angiography was less pronounced with iopamidol compared with diatrizoate as measured by mean ( +/- SD) increase in 24 h serum creatinine (0.11 +/- 0.2 versus 0.22 +/- 0.26 mg/dl, p less than 0.001), mean maximal increase in serum creatinine (0.2 +/- 0.44 versus 0.38 +/- 0.73 mg/dl, p less than 0.0001) and percent of patients with a maximal increase in serum creatinine greater than 0.5 mg/dl (8% versus 19%, p less than 0.01). Such differences could not be documented in diabetic patients using insulin. There was no significant difference between agents in the number of patients developing clinically severe acute renal dysfunction. It is concluded that iopamidol is less nephrotoxic than diatrizoate in high risk patients at cardiac angiography. However, the difference in nephrotoxicity is small, of no major clinical significance in the majority of high risk patients and could not be documented in insulin-using diabetic patients. Iopamidol may be the preferred agent in certain patients with advanced renal impairment, but further study is warranted.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Aulicky, R. Mikulik, D. Goldemund, M. Reif, M. Dufek, and T. Kubelka Safety of performing CT angiography in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2010; 81(7): 783 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Wessely, T. Koppara, C. Bradaric, M. Vorpahl, S. Braun, S. Schulz, J. Mehilli, A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, and for the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Followin Choice of Contrast Medium in Patients With Impaired Renal Function Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Mehran, E. Nikolsky, A. J. Kirtane, A. Caixeta, S. C. Wong, P. S. Teirstein, W. E. Downey, W. B. Batchelor, P. J. Casterella, Y.-H. Kim, et al. Ionic Low-Osmolar Versus Nonionic Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media to Obviate Worsening Nephropathy After Angioplasty in Chronic Renal Failure Patients: The ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 415 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Bruce, A. Djamali, K. Shinki, S. J. Michel, J. P. Fine, and M. A. Pozniak Background Fluctuation of Kidney Function Versus Contrast-Induced Nephrotoxicity Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 711 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Kuhn, N. Chen, D. V. Sahani, D. Reimer, E. J. R. van Beek, J. P. Heiken, and G. J. So The PREDICT Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Low- or Isoosmolar Contrast Agent Exposure Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 151 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Nguyen, P. Suranyi, J. G. Ravenel, P. K. Randall, P. B. Romano, K. A. Strom, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf Iso-Osmolality versus Low-Osmolality Iodinated Contrast Medium at Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT: Effect on Kidney Function Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 97 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-H. Jo, T.-J. Youn, B.-K. Koo, J.-S. Park, H.-J. Kang, Y.-S. Cho, W.-Y. Chung, G.-W. Joo, I.-H. Chae, D.-J. Choi, et al. Renal Toxicity Evaluation and Comparison Between Visipaque (Iodixanol) and Hexabrix (Ioxaglate) in Patients With Renal Insufficiency Undergoing Coronary Angiography: The RECOVER Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 924 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Dussol, S. Morange, A. Loundoun, P. Auquier, and Y. Berland A randomized trial of saline hydration to prevent contrast nephropathy in chronic renal failure patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2120 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tepel, P. Aspelin, and N. Lameire Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Clinical and Evidence-Based Approach Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1799 - 1806. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Detrenis, M. Meschi, S. Musini, and G. Savazzi Lights and shadows on the pathogenesis of contrast-induced nephropathy: state of the art Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 1542 - 1550. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Goldenberg and S. Matetzky Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 24, 2005; 172(11): 1461 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. Gleeson and S. Bulugahapitiya Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1673 - 1689. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Gupta, Y. Birnbaum, and B. F. Uretsky The renal patient with coronary artery disease: Current concepts and dilemmas J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1343 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kay, W. H. Chow, T. M. Chan, S. K. Lo, O. H. Kwok, A. Yip, K. Fan, C. H. Lee, and W. F. Lam Acetylcysteine for Prevention of Acute Deterioration of Renal Function Following Elective Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, February 5, 2003; 289(5): 553 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Kellerman Perioperative Care of the Renal Patient Arch Intern Med, August 8, 1994; 154(15): 1674 - 1688. [Abstract] [PDF]