Outcome probabilities and life history after surgical mitral commissurotomy: implications for balloon commissurotomy
MS Hickey,
EH Blackstone,
JW Kirklin,
and
LS Dean
Department of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham School of Medicine 35294.
From 1967 to 1988, 339 patients with mitral stenosis underwent surgical commissurotomy, 103 with a closed and 236 with an open technique. The 1 month and 1, 5, 10 and 20 year overall survival rate was 99.7%, 99%, 95%, 87% and 59%, respectively, and the technique (open versus closed) was not a risk factor. Technique was also not a risk factor for a second mitral commissurotomy, subsequent mitral valve replacement, thromboembolism or poor functional status. Risk factors were older age at commissurotomy, black race, higher pulmonary vascular resistance, mitral leaflet calcification, left ventricular enlargement and postcommissurotomy mitral incompetence. The closed technique was a risk factor for mitral incompetence immediately after commissurotomy, but important incompetence developed in only 2 of the 103 patients undergoing closed commissurotomy. Mitral valve replacement was not required within 10 years in 78% of patients and within 20 years in 47%. Despite some increased prevalence of postcommissurotomy mitral incompetence and particularly in view of the considerable long-term likelihood of mitral valve replacement, initial therapy for most patients with mitral stenosis should probably be surgical closed (or percutaneous balloon) mitral commissurotomy. The equations developed in the present study can be used to predict and compare outcome probability after percutaneous balloon commissurotomy with that after surgical commissurotomy and to compare these with outcome probability after mitral valve replacement.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Y. Chen and L. H. Cohn
Mitral Valve Repair
Card. Surg. Adult,
January 1, 2008;
3(2008):
1013 - 1030.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, Y. Yasumura, S. Nakatani, K. Kimura, K. Niwaya, O. Tagusari, and S. Kitamura
Consequence of atrial fibrillation and the risk of embolism after percutaneous mitral commissurotomy: The necessity of the maze procedure
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
September 1, 2004;
78(3):
800 - 805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Gillinov and D. M. Cosgrove III
Mitral Valve Repair
Card. Surg. Adult,
January 1, 2003;
2(2003):
933 - 950.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. Blackstone
Breaking down barriers: Helpful breakthrough statistical methods you need to understand better
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
September 1, 2001;
122(3):
430 - 439.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Iung, E. Garbarz, P. Michaud, A. Mahdhaoui, S. Helou, B. Farah, P. Berdah, P.-L. Michel, Y. Makita, B. Cormier, et al.
Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy for restenosis after surgical commissurotomy: Late efficacy and implications for patient selection
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 1, 2000;
35(5):
1295 - 1302.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Detter, T. Fischlein, C. Feldmeier, G. Nollert, H. Reichenspurner, and B. Reichart
Mitral commissurotomy, a technique outdated? long-term follow-up over a period of 35 years
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
December 1, 1999;
68(6):
2112 - 2118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Akinci, M. Degertekin, M. Guler, B. Daglar, N. Bozbuga, T. Berki, and C. Yakut
Less invasive approaches for closed mitral commissurotomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
September 1, 1999;
14(3):
274 - 278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Iung, E. Garbarz, P. Michaud, S. Helou, B. Farah, P. Berdah, P.-L. Michel, B. Cormier, and A. Vahanian
Late Results of Percutaneous Mitral Commissurotomy in a Series of 1024 Patients : Analysis of Late Clinical Deterioration: Frequency, Anatomic Findings, and Predictive Factors
Circulation,
June 29, 1999;
99(25):
3272 - 3278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Cotrufo, A. Renzulli, G. Ismeno, A. Caruso, C. Mauro, P. Caso, L. De Simone, and R. Violini
Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy versus open mitral commissurotomy: a comparative study
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
May 1, 1999;
15(5):
646 - 652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hernandez, C. Banuelos, F. Alfonso, J. Goicolea, A. Fernandez-Ortiz, J. Escaned, L. Azcona, C. Almeria, and C. Macaya
Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Follow-Up After Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty With the Inoue Balloon
Circulation,
March 30, 1999;
99(12):
1580 - 1586.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Farhat, M. Ayari, F. Maatouk, F. Betbout, H. Gamra, M. Jarrar, M. Tiss, S. Hammami, R. Thaalbi, and F. Addad
Percutaneous Balloon Versus Surgical Closed and Open Mitral Commissurotomy : Seven-Year Follow-up Results of a Randomized Trial
Circulation,
January 27, 1998;
97(3):
245 - 250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Orrange, D. T. Kawanishi, B. M. Lopez, S. M. Curry, and S. H. Rahimtoola
Actuarial Outcome After Catheter Balloon Commissurotomy in Patients With Mitral Stenosis
Circulation,
January 21, 1997;
95(2):
382 - 389.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Suri, R. Pathania, N. K. Jha, H. Singh, R. S. Dhaliwal, S. S. Rana, S. K. Thingnam, V. Sarwal, and J. S. Gujral
CLOSED MITRAL VALVOTOMY FOR MITRAL RESTENOSIS: EXPERIENCE IN 113 CONSECUTIVE CASES
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
September 1, 1996;
112(3):
727 - 730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. F. Palacios, M. E. Tuzcu, A. E. Weyman, J. B. Newell, and P. C. Block
Clinical Follow-up of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Valvotomy
Circulation,
February 1, 1995;
91(3):
671 - 676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Reyes, B. S. Raju, J. Wynne, L. W. Stephenson, R. Raju, B. S. Fromm, P. Rajagopal, P. Mehta, S. Singh, D. P. Rao, et al.
Percutaneous Balloon Valvuloplasty Compared with Open Surgical Commissurotomy for Mitral Stenosis
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 13, 1994;
331(15):
961 - 967.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|