Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:1696-1700
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayberry, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayberry, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S.

Increased birth prevalence of cardiac defects in Yuma, Arizona

JC Mayberry, WA Scott, and SJ Goldberg

Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson.

A systematic study was undertaken to estimate the birth prevalence of congenital heart disease because there was a clinical impression that a disproportionate number of cases occurred in Yuma, Arizona. Control data were obtained from Sierra Vista, Arizona, a region with similar demographic characteristics, and from the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study. Patients with chromosomal or syndromal associations were excluded. In the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study only echocardiographic and invasively documented cases were included. From 1983 to 1988 the birth prevalence was significantly higher in Yuma (10.5/1,000) than in Sierra Vista (5.4/1,000, p less than 0.0001). As assessed only by invasive or echocardiographic diagnosis, there was a higher birth prevalence of congenital heart disease in the study population (6.7/1,000) compared with both the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study (3.7/1,000, p = 0.0008) and Sierra Vista (4.6/1,000, p = 0.04). Families were interviewed to exclude cases in which the mother did not spend the month before conception and the first trimester in Yuma or Sierra Vista. The birth prevalence for Yuma (6.0/1,000) remained significantly greater than that for Sierra Vista (3.8/1,000, p = 0.03). The exclusion of cases in which the mother resided elsewhere suggests, but does not prove, that an environmental influence may have played a role in the increased birth prevalence of congenital heart disease in this community.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
J Billett, A Majeed, M Gatzoulis, and M Cowie
Trends in hospital admissions, in-hospital case fatality and population mortality from congenital heart disease in England, 1994 to 2004
Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): 342 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Caputo, G. Capozzi, M. G. Russo, T. Esposito, L. Martina, D. Cardaropoli, C. Ricci, P. Argiento, G. Pacileo, and R. Calabro
Familial recurrence of congenital heart disease in patients with ostium secundum atrial septal defect
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2005; 26(20): 2179 - 2184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. I. E. Hoffman and S. Kaplan
The incidence of congenital heart disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1890 - 1900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Wren, S Richmond, and L Donaldson
Temporal variability in birth prevalence of cardiovascular malformations
Heart, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 414 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
V. Grech
Patent Ductus Arteriosus in a Population-Based Study
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1999; 7(4): 301 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement