Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:1201-1204
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Midei, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinker, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Midei, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinker, J.

Is atrial activation beneficial in heart transplant recipients?

MG Midei, KL Baughman, SC Achuff, GD Walford, W Baumgartner, and JA Brinker

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Because of the distortion of atrial morphology that occurs during cardiac allograft transplantation in humans, the beneficial effects of properly sequenced atrial and ventricular activation are unclear in these patients. To evaluate the atrial contribution to ventricular pump performance in heart transplant recipients, arterial pressure and cardiac output during pacing from either chamber were measured in nine patients 10 +/- 1 days after transplantation. Systolic, diastolic and mean systemic arterial pressures were significantly higher during atrial pacing compared with ventricular pacing: 143 +/- 23 versus 125 +/- 20 mm Hg, 73 +/- 15 versus 66 +/- 14 mm Hg and 94 +/- 17 versus 84 +/- 16 mm Hg, respectively (p less than 0.05 for all). In addition, cardiac output decreased from 5.5 +/- 1.4 to 4.6 +/- 1.5 liters/min (p less than 0.005) for atrial versus ventricular pacing. Thus, there is a significant atrial contribution to cardiac performance in patients after heart transplantation. This may have clinical implications in those patients who later require a permanent pacemaker.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. B. Bittner, S. W. H. Kendall, E. P. Chen, R. D. Davis, and P. Van Trigt III
Complete atrioventricular cardiac transplantation: Improved performance compared with the standard technique
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1995; 60(2): 275 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. G. Leyh, A. W. Jahnke, E. G. Kraatz, and H.-H. Sievers
Cardiovascular dynamics and dimensions after bicaval and standard cardiac transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1995; 59(6): 1495 - 1500.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Bizouarn, M. Treilhaud, D. Portier, M. Train, and J.-L. Michaud
Right ventricular function early after total or standard orthotopic heart transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1994; 57(1): 183 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement