|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:1194-1200 © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.
Determinants of the ventricular cycle length during atrial fibrillation were examined in 52 patients. Thirty-three patients had structural heart disease and none had an accessory atrioventricular (AV) connection. The AV node effective and functional refractory periods, the shortest atrial pacing cycle length associated with 1:1 conduction, the AV node conduction time and indexes of concealed conduction in the AV node were measured in the baseline state (36 patients) and after modification of sympathetic tone by infusion of isoproterenol or propranolol (8 patients each). Atrial fibrillation was then induced with rapid atrial pacing, and the mean, shortest and longest ventricular cycle lengths were measured. Variables that correlated most strongly with the mean RR interval during atrial fibrillation were the AV node effective refractory period (r = 0.93; p less than 0.001), AV node functional refractory period (r = 0.87; p less than 0.001) and shortest atrial pacing cycle length associated with 1:1 conduction (r = 0.91; p less than 0.001). The AH interval during sinus rhythm (r = 0.74; p less than 0.001) and during atrial pacing at the shortest cycle length with 1:1 conduction (r = 0.52; p less than 0.001) had weaker correlations. Measures of concealed conduction did not improve the prediction of the mean or longest ventricular cycle length during atrial fibrillation. In conclusion, the refractory periods and conductivity of the AV node are the best indicators of the potential of the node to transmit atrial impulses to the ventricles during atrial fibrillation. The degree of concealed conduction in the AV node is a less important determinant of the mean ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Husser, D. Husser, M. Stridh, L. Sornmo, V. D.A. Corino, L. T. Mainardi, F. Lombardi, H. U. Klein, S. B. Olsson, and A. Bollmann Exercise testing for non-invasive assessment of atrial electrophysiological properties in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation Europace, August 1, 2007; 9(8): 627 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. U. Khand, A. C. Rankin, J. G.F. Cleland, I. Gemmell, E. Clark, and P. W. Macfarlane The assessment of autonomic function in chronic atrial fibrillation: description of a non-invasive technique based on circadian rhythm of atrioventricular nodal functional refractory periods. Europace, November 1, 2006; 8(11): 927 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. T. Leung, M. E. Bowman, T. M. Diep, G. Lorenzi-Filho, J. S. Floras, and T. D. Bradley Influence of Cheyne-Stokes respiration on ventricular response to atrial fibrillation in heart failure J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1689 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Falk Rate Control Is Preferable to Rhythm Control in the Majority of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, June 14, 2005; 111(23): 3141 - 3150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Toyonaga, T. Nakatsu, T. Murakami, S. Kusachi, K. Mashima, Y. Tominaga, S. Yamane, T. Uesugi, H. Kanai, and T. Tsuji Effects of Cilostazol on Heart Rate and its Variation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Associated With Bradycardia Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(3): 183 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C Rankin and A. J Workman Rate control in atrial fibrillation: role of atrial inputs to the AV node Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 249 - 251. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Garrigue, K. A. Mowrey, G. Fahy, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation : Role of Atrial Input Modification Circulation, May 4, 1999; 99(17): 2323 - 2333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hayano, F. Yamasaki, S. Sakata, A. Okada, S. Mukai, and T. Fujinami Spectral characteristics of ventricular response to atrial fibrillation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2811 - H2816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. van den Berg, J. Haaksma, J. Brouwer, R. G. Tieleman, G. Mulder, and H. J. G. M. Crijns Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Is Related to Vagal Tone Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1209 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Strickberger, R. Weiss, E. G. Daoud, R. Goyal, F. Bogun, K. C. Man, and F. Morady Ventricular Rate During Atrial Fibrillation Before and After Slow-Pathway Ablation: Effects of Autonomic Blockade and ß-Adrenergic Stimulation Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 1023 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S.-A. Chen, S.-H. Lee, C.-E. Chiang, C.-T. Tai, T.-J. Wu, C.-C. Cheng, Z.-C. Wen, C.-W. Chiou, K.-C. Ueng, and M.-S. Chang Electrophysiological Mechanisms in Successful Radiofrequency Catheter Modification of Atrioventricular Junction for Patients With Medically Refractory Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, May 1, 1996; 93(9): 1690 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kreiner, G. Heinz, P. Siostrzonek, and H. D. Gossinger Effect of Slow Pathway Ablation on Ventricular Rate During Atrial Fibrillation : Dependence on Electrophysiological Properties of the Fast Pathway Circulation, January 15, 1996; 93(2): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Blanck, A. A. Dhala, J. Sra, S. S. Deshpande, A. J. Anderson, M. Akhtar, and M. R. Jazayeri Characterization of Atrioventricular Nodal Behavior and Ventricular Response During Atrial Fibrillation Before and After a Selective Slow-Pathway Ablation Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1086 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |