Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:986-992
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearlman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weyman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearlman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weyman, A.

Echocardiographic definition of the left ventricular centroid. I. Analysis of methods for centroid calculation from a single tomogram

JD Pearlman, RD Hogan, PS Wiske, TD Franklin, and AE Weyman

Massachusetts General Hospital, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Boston.

Quantitation of myocardial contraction requires a frame of reference. Most investigators have sought a single reference frame per image, centered in some manner with respect to the mass of myocardium. Because there is no anatomic marker for the center of the heart, many different approaches have been pursued to identify a centroid of the left ventricle. The issue of whether the reference should be fixed throughout the cardiac cycle or float from image to image has been addressed in previous studies, but the more fundamental question of how a centroid can best be defined has not been answered. This study examines this basic issue by analysis of variance from observer to observer, cycle to cycle, animal to animal and method to method. Both endocardial and epicardial borders were digitized twice by each of two observers at 1/30 s intervals spanning the cardiac cycle for each of three cardiac cycles in six normal dogs. The left ventricular centroid was calculated by six methods: center of endocardial coordinates, center of epicardial coordinates, center of mid-myocardial (average) coordinates, center of endocardial area, center of epicardial area and center of mid-myocardial (average) area. The path of each centroid was correlated between observers and correlation coefficients were transformed for analysis of variance. This analysis indicates a best approach to centroid definition through distinct minimization of the variance: the best of the six methods proved to be center of endocardial area.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. J Lopez, R. J. Laham, A. Stamler, J. D Pearlman, S. Bunting, A. Kaplan, J. P Carrozza, F. W Sellke, and M. Simons
VEGF administration in chronic myocardial ischemia in pigs
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1998; 40(2): 272 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. Mor-Avi, P. Vignon, R. Koch, L. Weinert, M. J. Garcia, K. T. Spencer, and R. M. Lang
Segmental Analysis of Color Kinesis Images : New Method for Quantification of the Magnitude and Timing of Endocardial Motion During Left Ventricular Systole and Diastole
Circulation, April 15, 1997; 95(8): 2082 - 2097.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. M. Lang, P. Vignon, L. Weinert, J. Bednarz, C. Korcarz, J. Sandelski RDMS, R. Koch, D. Prater, and V. Mor-Avi
Echocardiographic Quantification of Regional Left Ventricular Wall Motion With Color Kinesis
Circulation, May 15, 1996; 93(10): 1877 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement