JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:637-643
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dumesnil, J.
Right arrow Articles by Beauchemin, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dumesnil, J.
Right arrow Articles by Beauchemin, J

Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography

JG Dumesnil, GN Honos, M Lemieux, and J Beauchemin

Quebec Heart Institute, Laval University, Sainte-Foy, Canada.

Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of aortic valve prostheses is based on the use of variables heretofore validated mostly for native valves. Accordingly, this study examined the validity and relative usefulness of the Doppler valve gradient and area measurements in 31 patients (mean age 69 +/- 10 years) 20 +/- 4 months after implantation of a given type of aortic bioprosthesis ranging in size from 19 to 29 mm. Valve area data obtained with both the standard and simplified continuity equations were compared with known in vitro prosthetic valve area measurements and an excellent correlation was obtained between the standard and simplified continuity equations (r = 0.98, SEE +/- 0.07 cm2, p less than 0.0005) and between in vivo and known in vitro prosthetic valve areas (r = 0.86, SEE +/- 0.16 cm2, p less than 0.0005). Peak gradient ranged from 10.8 to 75.0 mm Hg (mean 35 +/- 16) and mean gradient from 7.6 to 43.7 mm Hg (mean 20.5 +/- 9.5). The correlations between prosthetic valve gradient and in vivo area were r = -0.53, SEE +/- 14 mm Hg and r = -0.49, SEE +/- 8.63 mm Hg for peak and mean gradient, respectively. These relations were improved by indexing valve area by body surface area. The best correlations were obtained between indexed valve area and a quadratic function of the gradient (r = -0.72, SEE +/- 11.72 mm Hg and r = -0.70, SEE +/- 7.28 mm Hg for peak and mean gradient, respectively), reflecting a curvilinear relation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Kulik, M. Al-Saigh, V. Chan, R. G. Masters, P. Bedard, B.-K. Lam, F. D. Rubens, P. J. Hendry, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel
Enlargement of the Small Aortic Root During Aortic Valve Replacement: Is There a Benefit?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 94 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. M. Feuchtner, S. Muller, J. Bonatti, T. Schachner, C. Velik-Salchner, O. Pachinger, and W. Dichtl
Sixty-Four Slice CT Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis Using Planimetry of the Aortic Valve Area
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 197 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil
Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the mitral position: Old concept, new evidences
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1405 - 1408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P. Pibarot and J. G Dumesnil
Prevention of valve prosthesis--patient mismatch before aortic valve replacement: does it matter and is it feasible?
Heart, May 1, 2007; 93(5): 549 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. R. Bridges, S. M. O'Brien, J. C. Cleveland, E. B. Savage, J. S. Gammie, F. H. Edwards, E. D. Peterson, and F. L. Grover
Association between indices of prosthesis internal orifice size and operative mortality after isolated aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 1012 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. Flameng, B. Meuris, P. Herijgers, and M.-C. Herregods
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch is Not Clinically Relevant in Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P Pibarot and J G Dumesnil
Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention
Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1022 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
N. J. Howell, B. E. Keogh, V. Barnet, R. S. Bonser, T. R. Graham, S. J. Rooney, I. C. Wilson, and D. Pagano
Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 10 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. G. Dumesnil and P. Pibarot
Prosthesis-patient mismatch and clinical outcomes: The evidence continues to accumulate
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 952 - 955.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. M. Feuchtner, W. Dichtl, G. J. Friedrich, M. Frick, H. Alber, T. Schachner, J. Bonatti, A. Mallouhi, T. Frede, O. Pachinger, et al.
Multislice Computed Tomography for Detection of Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis and Quantification of Severity
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1410 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Sakamoto, K. Hashimoto, H. Okuyama, H. Takakura, S. Ishii, S. Taguchi, and H. Kagawa
Prevalence and Avoidance of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Aortic Valve Replacement in Small Adults
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1305 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Roscitano, U. Benedetto, A. Sciangula, E. Merico, F. Barberi, R. Bianchini, E. Tonelli, and R. Sinatra
Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 29(2): 139 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Tasca, Z. Mhagna, S. Perotti, P. B. Centurini, T. Sabatini, A. Amaducci, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo, M. D. Tomba, E. Quiani, et al.
Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Cardiac Events and Midterm Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 570 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Totaro, N. Degno, A. Zaidi, A. Youhana, and V. Argano
Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: A stented valve with stentless performance?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2005; 130(6): 1668 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Botzenhardt, W. B. Eichinger, S. Bleiziffer, R. Guenzinger, I. M. Wagner, R. Bauernschmitt, and R. Lange
Hemodynamic Comparison of Bioprostheses for Complete Supra-Annular Position in Patients With Small Aortic Annulus
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 21, 2005; 45(12): 2054 - 2060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Penta de Peppo, J. Zeitani, P. Nardi, G. Iaci, P. Polisca, R. De Paulis, and L. Chiariello
Small "Functional" Size after Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: No Risk in Young to Middle-Age Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 1915 - 1920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Li, J. G. Dumesnil, P. Mathieu, and P. Pibarot
Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure after mitral valve replacement
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 1034 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Tasca, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo, M. Dalla Tomba, Z. Mhagna, G. Troise, and E. Quaini
Impact of the Improvement of Valve Area Achieved With Aortic Valve Replacement on the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Pure Aortic Stenosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 79(4): 1291 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Tasca, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo, M. DallaTomba, Z. Mhagna, G. Troise, and E. Quaini
Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Left Ventricular Mass Regression Following Aortic Valve Replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 505 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Tasca, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo, A. Amaducci, Z. Mhagna, G. Troise, and E. Quaini
Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1107 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. H. Blackstone, D. M. Cosgrove, W.R. E. Jamieson, N. J. Birkmeyer, J. H. Lemmer Jr, D. C. Miller, E. G. Butchart, G. Rizzoli, M. Yacoub, and A. Chai
Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2003; 126(3): 783 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Blais, J. G. Dumesnil, R. Baillot, S. Simard, D. Doyle, and P. Pibarot
Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Short-Term Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement
Circulation, August 26, 2003; 108(8): 983 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, and L. L. Rodriguez
Prosthesis-patient size: measurement and clinical implications
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 313 - 316.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Bevilacqua, J. Gianetti, A. Ripoli, U. Paradossi, A. Giuseppe Cerillo, M. Glauber, M. L. Sacha Matteucci, M. Senni, A. Gamba, E. Quaini, et al.
Aortic valve disease with severe ventricular dysfunction: stentless valve for better recovery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2016 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Niinami, S. Aomi, H. Tomioka, K. Nakano, and H. Koyanagi
A comparison of the in vivo performance of the 19-mm St. Jude medical hemodynamic plus and 21-mm standard valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): 1120 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. J. Castro, J. M. Arcidi Jr, A. L. Fisher, and V. A. Gaudiani
Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 74(1): 31 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Gelsomino, G. Morocutti, R. Frassani, P. Da Col, R. Carella, and U. Livi
Usefulness of the cryolife o'brien stentless suprannular aortic valve to prevent prosthesis-patient mismatch in the small aortic root
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2002; 39(11): 1845 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. D. Milano, M. De Carlo, G. Mecozzi, A. D'Alfonso, G. Scioti, C. Nardi, and U. Bortolotti
Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 37 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Vitale, I. Caldarera, C. Muneretto, R. Sinatra, A. Scafuri, E. Di Rosa, A. Contini, N. Tedesco, A. Pierangeli, M. Abbate, et al.
Clinical evaluation of St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus versus standard aortic valve prostheses: The Italian multicenter, prospective, randomized study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 691 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Kadir, I. Y.P. Wan, C. Walsh, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon mechanical aortic prostheses using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 49 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
I. Knez, R. Rienmuller, R. Maier, P. Rehak, B. Schrottner, H. Machler, M. Anelli-Monti, and B. Rigler
Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 797 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. E. Girard, F. A. Miller Jr., T. A. Orszulak, C. J. Mullany, S. Montgomery, W. D. Edwards, H. D. Tazelaar, J. F. Malouf, and A. J. Tajik
Reoperation for prosthetic aortic valve obstruction in the era of echocardiography: trends in diagnostic testing and comparison with surgical findings
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2001; 37(2): 579 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil
Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1131 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas
An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Garcia, P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, F. Sakr, and L.-G. Durand
Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity : A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept
Circulation, February 22, 2000; 101(7): 765 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, J. Jobin, P. Cartier, G. Honos, and L.-G. Durand
Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1609 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Kadir, B. Reeves, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1657 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, B. Wall, P. Myken, S. Larsson, and I. Wallentin
INFLUENCE OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT, PROSTHESIS TYPE, AND SIZEON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND VENTRICULAR MASS IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1999; 118(1): 57 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. C. Cartier, J. G. Dumesnil, J. Metras, D. Desaulniers, D. P. Doyle, M. D. Lemieux, and G. Raymond
Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1999; 67(2): 345 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
U. Hvass, G. M. Palatianos, R. Frassani, C. Puricelli, and M. O'Brien
MULTICENTER STUDY OF STENTLESS VALVE REPLACEMENT IN THE SMALL AORTIC ROOT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1999; 117(2): 267 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
X. Y. Jin, K. Dhital, K. Bhattacharya, R. Pieris, N. Amarasena, and R. Pillai
Fifth-year hemodynamic performance of the prima stentless aortic valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 805 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter
Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
U. Demirkilic, E. Kuralay, E. Ozal, H. Bingol, C. Sag, A. T Yilmaz, and H. Tatar
Medium-Term Outcome With Small Size ATS Medical Valves in Aortic Position
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 183 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Chakraborty, S. Quek, Ding Zee Pin, Chee Tek Siong, Tan Ley Kheng, and B. Chakraborty
Evaluation of Normal Hemodynamic Profile of Carbomedics Prosthetic Valves by Doppler Echocardiography
Angiology, December 1, 1997; 48(12): 1055 - 1061.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. E. David, J. Kuo, and S. Armstrong
AORTIC AND MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH RECONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERVALVULAR FIBROUS BODY
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 1997; 114(5): 766 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. E. Sommers and T. E. David
Aortic Valve Replacement With Patch Enlargement of the Aortic Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1997; 63(6): 1608 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, G. M. De Matteis, E. Caprara, F. Tomai, A. P. de Peppo, P. Polisca, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello
EXTENT AND PATTERN OF REGRESSION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL SIZE CARBOMEDICS AORTIC VALVES
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1997; 113(5): 901 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Kadir, M. B. Izzat, P. Wilde, B. Reeves, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Dynamic Evaluation of the 21-mm Medtronic Intact Aortic Bioprosthesis by Dobutamine Echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1997; 63(4): 1128 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak
Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Chakraborty, S. Quek, Ding Zee Pin, Chee Tek Siong, and Tan Lay Kheng
Doppler Echocardiographic Assessment of Normally Functioning Starr-Edwards, Carbomedics and Carpentier-Edwards Valves in Aortic Position
Angiology, May 1, 1996; 47(5): 481 - 489.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Carrel, U. Zingg, R. Jenni, B. Aeschbacher, and M. I. Turina
Early In Vivo Experience With the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical Heart Valves in Patients With Narrowed Aortic Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1418 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Birdi, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCES OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL AND CARBOMEDICS 21 MM AORTIC PROSTHESES BY MEANS OF DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1996; 111(2): 408 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Birdi, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Small CarboMedics Aortic Prostheses Using Dobutamine-Stress Doppler Echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1995; 60(4): 1048 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, F. Russo, F. Tomai, A. Tondo, C. Pagliaricci, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello
Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic anulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1994; 108(1): 57 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
E.G. Cape, W. Jaarsma, and A.P. Yoganathan
Echo Doppler principles, techniques and applications for the cardiac surgeon
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S2 - S12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J.G. Dumesnil and A.P. Yoganathan
Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S34 - S38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B.G. Barratt-Boyes
Clinical experience with the zero-pressure-fixed Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S79 - S81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. Vermeulen, G. Bennink, S. Ernst, W. Jaarsma, P.A. Chevalier, and D.V. Lutz
The intact porcine bioprosthesis: early world-wide clinical experience and analysis of a single institution's experience
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S124 - S127.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.