|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:332-339 © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Charles A Dana Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Balloon-expandable stents were placed successfully in 35 (95%) of 37 patients whose right coronary artery lesion was believed to have a poor short- or long-term prognosis with conventional balloon angioplasty because of prior restenosis or adverse lesion morphology. Quantitative angiography showed a reduction in stenosis diameter from 83 +/- 14% to 42 +/- 14% after conventional balloon dilation, with a further reduction to -3 +/- 12% after stent placement (p less than 0.001). There were no acute stent thromboses, but one patient (with two stents and unstented distal disease) developed subacute thrombosis on day 8 after self-discontinuation of warfarin and was treated with thrombolytic therapy and redilation. Follow-up angiography was performed at 4 to 6 months in 25 patients, demonstrating restenosis (83 +/- 13%) in 4 (57%) of 7 patients with multiple stents, but only 3 (17%) of 18 patients with a single stent (p less than 0.05). Six of the seven in-stent restenotic lesions were subtotal (80 +/- 12%) and were subjected to repeat conventional balloon angioplasty (postdilation stenosis 13 +/- 21%). The 18 patients without restenosis had a maximal in-stent diameter stenosis of 29 +/- 15%, corresponding to a maximal focal neointimal thickness of 0.68 +/- 0.26 mm within the stented segment. These preliminary results suggest that the Schatz-Palmaz stent may be a useful adjunctive device in the performance of coronary angioplasty.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Kobayashi, J. De Gregorio, N. Kobayashi, T. Akiyama, B. Reimers, L. Finci, C. Di Mario, and A. Colombo Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 651 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rogers and E. R. Edelman Endovascular Stent Design Dictates Experimental Restenosis and Thrombosis Circulation, June 15, 1995; 91(12): 2995 - 3001. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |