JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:57-65
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stertzer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stertzer, S.

Bidirectional crossover and late outcome after coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery: 8 to 11 year follow-up

JG Webb, RK Myler, RE Shaw, A Anwar, MC Murphy, JF Mooney, MR Mooney, and SH Stertzer

San Francisco Heart Institute, Seton Medical Center, Daly City, California 94015.

Between March 1978 and July 1981, 217 symptomatic patients underwent coronary angioplasty as an alternative to coronary bypass surgery. Angioplasty was successful in 143 patients (66%), unsuccessful but uncomplicated in 65 (30%) and complicated in 9 (4%) by one or more of the following criteria: Q wave myocardial infarction (2%), emergency surgery (4%) or death (0.5%). Late follow-up evaluation was obtained in 213 patients at a mean of 9 +/- 1 years. Of patients in whom angioplasty was successful, 59 (42%) of 140 required another revascularization procedure (repeat angioplasty in 26% and bypass surgery in 16%). The actuarial survival rate at 5, 9 and 10 years after successful angioplasty was 98%, 93% and 92%, respectively. Of the 65 patients with unsuccessful and uncomplicated angioplasty (usually as a result of technical factors), 58 underwent elective bypass surgery within 2 months and 56 survived. These 56 surgical patients were compared with the 140 patients with successful angioplasty. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors did not reveal significant differences between these two groups. At late follow-up study, the successful angioplasty and the successful surgical groups had similar rates of survival (93% versus 95%, p = NS) and of death or infarction, or both (11% versus 12.5%, p = NS). Repeat revascularization was required more frequently after successful angioplasty than after surgery (42% versus 18%, p less than 0.001). Crossover from angioplasty to surgery occurred slightly more often than from surgery to angioplasty (16% versus 12.5%, p = NS). The time to crossover from angioplasty to surgery occurred earlier than from surgery to angioplasty (mean 21 versus 76 months, p less than 0.001).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
M. Aristides, M. Gliksman, N. Rajan, and P. Davey
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of single bolus treatment with abciximab (Reo Pro) in preventing restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in high risk patients
Heart, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 12 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.