Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:130-135
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balady, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balady, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, T.

Physiologic responses to arm ergometry exercise relative to age and gender

GJ Balady, DA Weiner, L Rose, and TJ Ryan

Evans Memorial Department of Clinical Research, Boston University Medical Center 02118.

Arm ergometry exercise testing is a valuable alternative method used in the evaluation and management of patients with both cardiac disease and lower limb impairment. The purpose of this study is to provide information concerning the physiologic responses of normal healthy subjects to arm ergometry relative to age and gender, which could serve as a standard for comparison. Eighty healthy subjects (age 22 to 59 years) cycled at 75 to 80 rpm (on a bicycle adapted for arm ergometry) starting at a power output of 10 W, increasing at 10 W/2 min until exhaustion. Sixty subjects were classified on the basis of age into three groups, each with 10 men and 10 women. Men achieved significantly (p less than 0.001) higher power output (95 +/- 25 W) and oxygen consumption (20.7 +/- 3.9 ml/kg per min) than did women (56 +/- 19 W and 15.5 +/- 3.1 ml/kg per min, respectively). The heart rate response to total body oxygen demand during arm ergometry was significantly higher in women than in men (p less than 0.001). These findings were also present when men and women of each age group were analyzed separately. Older subjects reached a significantly (p less than 0.02) lower peak power output than did younger subjects although they reached a similar level of oxygen consumption. Separate regression equations for predicting oxygen consumption at each power output were formulated for men and women and validated in 20 other subjects. Small differences in measured and predicted oxygen consumption at each stage were found. These data provide additional information concerning arm ergometry testing and should prove useful in diagnostic exercise testing and cardiac rehabilitation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Myers, R. Arena, B. Franklin, I. Pina, W. E. Kraus, K. McInnis, G. J. Balady, and on behalf of the American Heart Association Commit
Recommendations for Clinical Exercise Laboratories: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Circulation, June 23, 2009; 119(24): 3144 - 3161.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
W A Birkett and D F Edwards
The use of one-arm crank ergometry in the prediction of upper body aerobic capacity
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 1998; 12(4): 319 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
I. L. Pina, G. J. Balady, P. Hanson, A. J. Labovitz, D. W. Madonna, and J. Myers
Guidelines for Clinical Exercise Testing Laboratories : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation, American Heart Association
Circulation, February 1, 1995; 91(3): 912 - 921.
[Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement