JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 16:124-129
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foult, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Foult, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, A

Size dependence of the end-systolic stress/volume ratio in humans: implications for the evaluation of myocardial contractile performance in pressure and volume overload

JM Foult, A Loiseau, and A Nitenberg

Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Xavier Bichat, Paris, France.

The end-systolic stress/volume ratio is currently recognized as a relatively load-independent index of myocardial contractile performance, but its dependence on ventricular size may limit its value for interpatient comparisons. In this study, the relation between the end-systolic stress/volume ratio and left ventricular end-diastolic volume was angiographically analyzed in 104 patients with normal coronary angiograms. Eighteen patients had a normal ventricle, 24 had aortic stenosis, 18 had aortic regurgitation, 9 had mitral regurgitation and 35 had cardiomyopathy. An inverse relation between the end-systolic stress/volume ratio and left ventricular end-diastolic volume was demonstrated in the normal group (r = 0.72, p less than 0.001); subjects with a larger left ventricle had a reduced index but, presumably, the same degree of contractility as that of subjects with a smaller ventricle. Attempts to normalize values by using end-diastolic volume or body surface area were unsuccessful. A similar inverse relation was demonstrated in the aortic stenosis group (r = 0.48, p less than 0.05), probably because hypertrophy helps to keep wall stress normal or low despite progressive ventricular enlargement in these patients. The end-systolic stress/volume ratio was also inversely related to left ventricular chamber size in patients with volume overload due to aortic regurgitation (r = 0.80, p less than 0.001) and in those with cardiomyopathy (r = 0.84, p less than 0.001). However, at a given left ventricular end-diastolic volume, the end-systolic stress/volume ratio was higher in patients with aortic regurgitation than in those with cardiomyopathy, suggesting better contractile performance for a comparable degree of ventricular dilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.