Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.

The visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms by individuals has been shown to be variable and inaccurate. To determine whether observer accuracy improves with experience or with use of the mean values obtained from a panel of observers, the visual readings of percent diameter stenosis and "normal" reference segment diameter were compared with the quantitative analyses of 13 randomly chosen coronary stenoses. Visual interpretation was also performed on cineangiograms of seven phantom stenoses ranging in severity from 17% to 83%. Repeated quantitative arteriography demonstrated good intraobserver variability for minimal stenosis diameter (r = 0.91, SD = 0.23 mm) and percent diameter stenosis (r = 0.93, SD = 6.4%). When the mean of the repeated quantitative analyses was used as the standard, visual interpretations of percent diameter stenosis were found to have considerable inaccuracy (r = 0.78, SD = 14.5%). Phantom percent diameter stenosis data were better correlated (r = 0.85), but accuracy remained poor (SD = 17.8%). Fifty percent narrowings were read over a range from 30% to 95%. Substantial inaccuracies were also found for observer assessment of normal reference segment diameter (r = 0.75, SD = 0.75 mm). Observer accuracy of percent stenosis did not correlate with prior angiographic experience but was progressively improved by taking the mean value of the interpretations of three and five experienced angiographers (r = 0.88, 0.89; SD = 11.3%, 8.3%, respectively). These findings suggest that arteriographic interpretations accurate enough for interventional decisions can only be obtained using quantitative arteriography or the mean value of data from a large panel of angiographers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Rocha-Singh, M. R. Jaff, K. Rosenfield, and for the ASPIRE-2 Trial Investigators Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Renal Artery Stenting After Unsuccessful Balloon Angioplasty: The ASPIRE-2 Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 6, 2005; 46(5): 776 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. L. Leape, D. M. Berwick, and D. W. Bates What Practices Will Most Improve Safety?: Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Patient Safety JAMA, July 24, 2002; 288(4): 501 - 507. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.A Kerensky, J.T Cusma, P Kubilis, R Simon, T.M Bashore, J.W Hirshfeld Jr, D.R Holmes Jr, C.J Pepine, and S.E Nissen American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase I. The effects of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 668 - 678. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Kerensky, J. T. Cusma, P. Kubilis, R.u. Simon, T. M. Bashore, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr., D. R. Holmes Jr., C. J. Pepine, and S. E. Nissen American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase I: The effects of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2000; 35(5): 1370 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. I. Manninen, P. Jaakkola, M. Suhonen, S. Rehnberg, R. Vuorenniemi, and P. J. Matsi Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous grafts Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1998; 66(4): 1289 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Altstidl, M. Regenfus, H. Lehmkuhl, H. Dill, K. Bachmann, and R. Altstidl Evaluation of Successful PTCA by Transstenotic Flow Velocity Ratios Angiology, September 1, 1997; 48(9): 775 - 782. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. A. Baker, S. E. Hearne, L. A. Spero, K. G. Morris, R. A. Harrington, M. H. Sketch Jr, V. S. Behar, Y. Kong, R. H. Peter, T. M. Bashore, et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG Compression of Digital Coronary Angiograms Does Not Limit Detection of Subtle Morphological Features Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1157 - 1164. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. M. Fleming, D. M. Fleming, and R. Gaede Training Physicians and Health Care Providers to Accurately Read Coronary Arteriograms A Training Program Angiology, April 1, 1996; 47(4): 349 - 359. [Abstract] [PDF]