Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:1654-1661
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitabatake, A
Right arrow Articles by Kamada, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitabatake, A
Right arrow Articles by Kamada, T

Doppler echocardiographic quantitation of cross-sectional area under various hemodynamic conditions: an experimental validation in a canine model of supravalvular aortic stenosis

A Kitabatake, K Fujii, J Tanouchi, K Ishihara, M Uematsu, T Masuyama, Y Yoshida, M Hori, and T Kamada

First Department of Medicine, Osaka University School of Medicine, Japan.

The hemodynamic effects on cross-sectional area calculated with the continuity equation were assessed in canine experiments. In 13 open chest dogs, 46 supravalvular aortic stenoses were created by aortic root banding. The cross-sectional area of the stenosis was calculated by Doppler echocardiography with application of the continuity equation before and after the following hemodynamic interventions: protocol 1, atrial pacing at 90, 120, 150 and 180 beats/min after sinus node crush; protocol 2, preload reduction by mild and severe clamping of the inferior vena cava; and protocol 3, afterload augmentation by mild and severe clamping of the descending aorta. In each observation, a dimension of the stenosis was directly measured by two-dimensional echocardiography, and the cross-sectional area was determined as a reference standard. As a result of the hemodynamic interventions, significant changes were observed in stroke volume and pressure gradient (protocol 1), in cardiac output, stroke volume and pressure gradient (protocol 2) and in heart rate, cardiac output and pressure gradient (protocol 3). Despite these changes in hemodynamic variables, the Doppler-derived cross-sectional area showed no significant change for a given stenosis. In addition, areas calculated with the continuity equation (x) agreed well with those determined by two-dimensional echocardiography (y) (r = 0.96, p less than 0.001, y = 0.97x + 0.02, SEE = +/- 0.06 cm2). Thus, it is concluded that Doppler echocardiography with application of the continuity equation accurately predicts the stenotic cross-sectional area over a wide range of hemodynamic conditions in supravalvular aortic stenosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Garcia, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, L. Kadem, and P. Pibarot
Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 435 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. A. Levine and E. Schwammenthal
Stenosis is in the eye of the observer: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aortic valve area
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 443 - 445.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement