Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:1409-1416
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, M
Right arrow Articles by Freedom, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, M
Right arrow Articles by Freedom, R.

Echocardiographic analysis of regional left ventricular wall motion in normal children and neonates

M Vogel, JF Smallhorn, JI Stein, and RM Freedom

Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Ontario, Canada.

Because comprehensive normal data and the effect of observer variability for echocardiographic evaluation of regional left ventricular wall motion are not available in children or newborns, left ventricular wall motion was assessed by measuring regional area change. The study group comprised 55 infants and children with a normal heart: 15 neonates (greater than 1 week to less than 1 month old), 10 infants (greater than 1 month to less than 1 year old) and 30 children, 10 each in the age group greater than 1 year to less than 5 years, greater than 5 to less than or equal to 10 years and greater than 10 years. A combination of parasternal, apical and subcostal two-dimensional echocardiographic views was applied. After planimetry of an end-systolic and end-diastolic frame, the left ventricle was divided into eight equal segments and the percent area change calculated. Both a fixed reference and a floating system correcting for translation and rotation were applied. Intraobserver variability for percent area change measurements was 2.8 +/- 0.9% and 3.8 +/- 1% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The mean interobserver difference of regional percent area change was 4.7 +/- 1.8%. Normal values for the eight anatomic segments were established in each echocardiographic imaging plane. The overall results were independent of the type of reference system utilized. The subcostal views yielded different results from their parasternal counterparts, probably because of differing imaging planes. These normal values establish a data base in the pediatric age range that can be used to detect abnormal segments in children at risk for developing regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities.




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement