Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:1270-1276
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turitto, G
Right arrow Articles by Prati, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turitto, G
Right arrow Articles by Prati, P.

The signal-averaged electrocardiogram and ventricular arrhythmias after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction

G Turitto, AL Risa, E Zanchi, and PL Prati

Cardiology Division, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy.

The prevalence of an abnormal signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG) and ventricular arrhythmias on 24 h ambulatory electrocardiography was evaluated in 118 patients 13 +/- 2 days after acute myocardial infarction. Group 1 (46 patients) underwent intravenous thrombolysis within 6 h of the onset of symptoms, whereas Group 2 (72 patients) did not. An abnormal signal-averaged ECG was seen in 15% of patients in Group 1 and 21% of those in Group 2 (difference not significant). The number of ventricular premature complexes/h was lower in Group 1 than in Group 2: 2.58 +/- 1.63 versus 7.91 +/- 10.75 (p less than 0.01). However, complex arrhythmias (greater than or equal to 10 ventricular premature complexes/h or ventricular tachycardia) were equally common in Groups 1 and 2 (20% versus 22%, respectively). Their prevalence was similar in patients with or without an abnormal signal-averaged ECG (29% versus 18%, respectively, in Group 1 and 27% versus 21%, respectively, in Group 2). Comparison between patients with (n = 26) or without (n = 20) angiographic patency of the infarct-related coronary artery after thrombolysis showed no significant difference in the prevalence of an abnormal signal-averaged ECG (8% versus 25%, respectively) and complex ventricular arrhythmias (19% versus 20%, respectively). These data suggest that thrombolysis does not affect the prevalence of complex ventricular arrhythmias and an abnormal signal-averaged ECG or their relation after acute myocardial infarction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & RehabilitationHome page
A. P. Maggioni and G. Zuanetti
Arrhythmias and the Autonomic Nervous System
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, December 1, 1994; 1(4): 322 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement