The prognostic significance of first myocardial infarction type (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location. The Multicenter Diltiazem Post-Infarction Research Group

Heart Research Follow-Up Program, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York.

The prognostic significance of the type of first acute myocardial infarction (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location (anterior versus inferoposterior) was determined from a multicenter data base involving 777 placebo-treated patients who were participants in the Multicenter Diltiazem Post-Infarction Trial. There were 224 patients (29%) with a non-Q wave infarction, 326 (42%) with an inferoposterior Q wave infarction and 227 (29%) with an anterior Q wave infarction. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly (p less than 0.001) lower in patients with an anterior Q wave infarction than in the other two groups (anterior Q wave 0.39; inferior Q wave 0.52; non-Q wave 0.53). Nevertheless, the total cardiac mortality rate during the follow-up period (average 25 months per patient) was only marginally higher (p = 0.42) in the anterior Q wave group (8.4%) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 7.1%; non-Q wave 6.3%). The total first recurrent cardiac event was somewhat higher (p = 0.08) in the anterior Q wave group (18.1%) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 11.7%; non-Q wave 15.6%). Survivorship analyses extending over 3 years revealed that electrocardiographic classification of the type of first infarction and Q wave location did not make significant independent contributions to the risk of postinfarction cardiac death or first recurrent cardiac event, either before or after adjustment for baseline clinical variables.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Y. Chan, J. L. Sun, L. K. Newby, L. K. Shaw, M. Lin, E. D. Peterson, R. M. Califf, D. F. Kong, and M. T. Roe Long-Term Mortality of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization for ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, June 23, 2009; 119(24): 3110 - 3117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Tomoda and N. Aoki Pathophysiology of Early Coronary Angioplasty with Stenting on Non-Q-Wave vs Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Angiology, October 1, 2001; 52(10): 671 - 679. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J Herlitz, B W Karlson, M Sjolin, and J Lindqvist Ten year mortality in subsets of patients with an acute coronary syndrome Heart, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 391 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Abdulla, B Brendorp, C Torp-Pedersen, L Kober, and on behalf of the TRACE study group Does the electrocardiographic presence of Q waves influence the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction? Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2001; 22(12): 1008 - 1014. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N P Curzen, D J Patel, M Kemp, J Hooper, C J Knight, D Clarke, C Wright, and K M Fox Can C reactive protein or troponins T and I predict outcome in patients with intractable unstable angina? Heart, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 23 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. J. Berger, J. M. Murabito, J. C. Evans, K. M. Anderson, and D. Levy Prognosis After First Myocardial Infarction: Comparison of Q-Wave and Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction in the Framingham Heart Study JAMA, September 23, 1992; 268(12): 1545 - 1551. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Moss Q-Wave vs Non--Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction: An Oversimplified Dichotomy JAMA, September 23, 1992; 268(12): 1595 - 1596. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Krone The Role of Risk Stratification in the Early Management of a Myocardial Infarction Ann Intern Med, February 1, 1992; 116(3): 223 - 237. [Abstract] [PDF]