JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:974-982
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Dixhoorn, J
Right arrow Articles by Pool, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Dixhoorn, J
Right arrow Articles by Pool, J

Success and failure of exercise training after myocardial infarction: is the outcome predictable?

J van Dixhoorn, HJ Duivenvoorden, and J Pool

St. Joannes de Deo Hospital, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

One hundred fifty-six patients underwent a 5 week daily exercise training program after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Outcome was assessed on the basis of exercise testing, integrating the measurements into a single outcome measure consisting of three categories (positive, n = 79; negative, n = 42; no change, n = 35). This composite criterion served as the end point for determining the predictability of a positive (training success) and negative (training failure) outcome. With use of logistic regression analysis, the baseline variables of clinical information, exercise data and psychosocial variables were able to identify patients with training success, as well as patients with failure (correct classification rates 81% and 85%, respectively). The characteristics of patients for whom training was beneficial differed from those of patients with a negative outcome. Work status before infarction was the single most important predictor of success, but it did not determine failure. Psychologic variables (type A behavior, well-being, depression) were important for predicting failure, but not for predicting success. Cardiac state and physical fitness largely determined training success. It is concluded that the physical benefit of exercise training in patients after myocardial infarction is highly predictable. Validation will make it possible to optimally apply exercise training as a therapeutic modality in these patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Specchia, S. De Servi, A. Scire, J. Assandri, C. Berzuini, L. Angoli, M. T. La Rovere, and F. Cobelli
Interaction Between Exercise Training and Ejection Fraction in Predicting Prognosis After a First Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 978 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.