Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:1173-1180
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flachskampf, F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flachskampf, F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J.

Influence of orifice geometry and flow rate on effective valve area: an in vitro study

FA Flachskampf, AE Weyman, JL Guerrero, and JD Thomas

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114.

Fluid dynamics suggests that orifice geometry is a determinant of discharge properties and, therefore, should influence empiric constants in formulas (such as the Gorlin formula) to calculate stenotic valve area. An in vitro study utilizing a model of transmitral flow was conducted to investigate how the discharge coefficient changes with 1) orifice eccentricity (ratio of long to short diameter), 2) absolute area, 3) the presence of a nozzle-like inlet, and 4) varying flow. Twenty-three orifices with areas varying between 0.3 and 2.5 cm2 and eccentricities from 1:1, or circular, to 5:1, or elliptic, were tested. The calculated discharge coefficients ranged between 0.675 and 0.93. For a given area, the discharge coefficient decreased by a mean value (+/- SD) of 5.5 +/- 1.3% between circular orifices and 5:1 ellipses. Discharge coefficients increased by a mean of 8.9 +/- 3.5% from 0.3 to 2.5 cm2 area within each eccentricity class. A gradually tapering inlet (nozzle) raised the discharge coefficient by 8.8 +/- 3.9%, leading to a discharge coefficient between 0.81 and 0.93 for round orifices. The discharge coefficient did not change appreciably with flow. The concept of the discharge coefficient and its role in assessing restrictive orifices in general by hydraulic formulas (for example, the Gorlin and pressure half-time calculations) are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): e523 - e661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): e1 - e142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Mascherbauer, C. Fuchs, M. Stoiber, H. Schima, E. Pernicka, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner
Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2008; 29(16): 2049 - 2057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. A. Flachskampf
Severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and apparently preserved left ventricular systolic function--under-recognized or overdiagnosed?
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 966 - 968.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 598 - 675.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Zamorano, L. Perez de Isla, L. Sugeng, P. Cordeiro, J. L. Rodrigo, C. Almeria, L. Weinert, T. Feldman, C. Macaya, R. M. Lang, et al.
Non-invasive assessment of mitral valve area during percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty: role of real-time 3D echocardiography
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2086 - 2091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Hartrumpf, J. M. Albes, T. Krempl, V. Rudolph, and T. Wahlers
The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 23(3): 283 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Gilon, E. G. Cape, M. D. Handschumacher, J.-K. Song, J. Solheim, M. VanAuker, M. E. E. King, and R. A. Levine
Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: Three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1479 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, I. Wallentin, P. Ask, and B. Wranne
Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: An in vivo and in vitro study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 287 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. J. Garcia, M. S. Firstenberg, N. L. Greenberg, N. Smedira, L. Rodriguez, D. Prior, and J. D. Thomas
Estimation of left ventricular operating stiffness from Doppler early filling deceleration time in humans
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2001; 280(2): H554 - H561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. S. Firstenberg, P. M. Vandervoort, N. L. Greenberg, N. G. Smedira, P. M. McCarthy, M. J. Garcia, and J. D. Thomas
Noninvasive estimation of transmitral pressure drop across the normal mitral valve in humans: importance of convective and inertial forces during left ventricular filling
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1942 - 1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. M. Binder, R. Rosenhek, G. Porenta, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner
Improved assessment of mitral valve stenosis by volumetric real-time three-dimensional echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1355 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, and K.-R. Karsch
Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1355 - 1363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Gilon, E. G. Cape, M. D. Handschumacher, L. Jiang, C. Sears, J. Solheim, E. Morris, J. T. Strobel, S. M. Miller-Jones, A. E. Weyman, et al.
Insights From Three-dimensional Echocardiographic Laser Stereolithography: Effect of Leaflet Funnel Geometry on the Coefficient of Orifice Contraction, Pressure Loss, and the Gorlin Formula in Mitral Stenosis
Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 452 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. Voelker, H. Reul, G. N. Ing, T. S. Ing, B. S. Ing, A. S. Ing, and K. R. Karsch
Comparison of Valvular Resistance, Stroke Work Loss, and Gorlin Valve Area for Quantification of Aortic Stenosis : An In Vitro Study in a Pulsatile Aortic Flow Model
Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1196 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement